W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 15:25:20 +0000
Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9ED046C9-5B26-429C-94EE-BCD7A4FE2018@cyganiak.de>
To: nathan@webr3.org
On 6 Mar 2011, at 14:40, Nathan wrote:
>> My concern isn't all that much about graph literals, although I don't see the evidence for them being needed.
> 
> Cool, okay - do you know of any problems that may be caused by including them?

Like any feature, it adds cost for implementors.

Best,
Richard



> 
> Cheers, Nathan
> 
Received on Sunday, 6 March 2011 15:26:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:03 UTC