- From: Alex Hall <alexhall@revelytix.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:25:36 -0400
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, nathan@webr3.org, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTi=N5_oL4EMZ6FWF3Hgeo8kr4XbjecjoDTCLD3GD@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: > If it ain't broken, don't fix it. And if nobody noticed this until now, I > submit that it is not broken. > > Pat > It ain't broken in SPARQL because of the explicitly stated rule that longest match wins, meaning there's only one way to tokenize a sequence of characters. I'm fine with using the same rule in Turtle, but I don't see any such language in the Jan 2010 editor's draft. -Alex > > On Mar 30, 2011, at 3:41 PM, Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider wrote: > > > From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> > > Subject: Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle? > > Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:18:55 -0500 > > > >> Andy Seaborne wrote: > >>> By the way, this is not the only place that "longest token" is > important: > >>> > >>> { :x :p18. } > >>> > >>> is that ":p1 8." or ":p 18" or ":p18" and an error? That has not been > >>> a practical issue raised. > >> > >> Goodness, you're right, I've just noticed that there's hardly any white > >> space requirements in the EBNF, which means a whole lot of garbage can > >> be produced of course, for example this is a list of three integers > (123). > >> > >> Needs fixed. > > > > I don't think that lists *need* to be fixed. See one of my earlier > > message for more on this. > > > > This is separate from *should" be fixed, but I don't think that this > > should be fixed either. > > > > peter > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile > phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 31 March 2011 02:26:09 UTC