- From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:06:08 -0400
- To: <gavin@topquadrant.com>
- CC: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, <nathan@webr3.org>
From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@topquadrant.com> Subject: Re: [JSON] I say again, what *is* JSON? Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:53:25 -0500 > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider > <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: >> Hmm. >> >> Is this really the JSON spec? > > No. > > [... snip ...] >> >> >> So, I ask again, is there a definition JSON somewhere around? > > Yes, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt it is "just" a grammar. I note that the character encoding here appears to be different from that in the JavaScript document. > The > mapping of JSON into the object model of the parsers language is not > specified. So then, how can the WG talk about round-tripping, etc., etc.? > From section 2.2: > > The names within an object SHOULD be unique. Hmm. This doesn't appear in json.org or in the JavaScript document. > While it does say SHOULD, but it is in reality a MUST. Except that there are lots of "MUST"s in the document, so one SHOULD be able to have non-unique names, if the circumstances warrant. > --Gavin peter
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:06:50 UTC