- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:06:27 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 7 March 2011 09:04:46 UTC
On Mar 6, 2011, at 15:19 , Andy Seaborne wrote: > > At the moment we have plain literals, rdf:plainLiteral, and > > xsd:string literals. They are very very close to one another but they > > are officially different. In practice this means that, eg, SPARQL > > queries have to have a three branch UNION to handle all of these. > > Worth looking at some sort of a reconciliation of these > > rdf:plainLiteral should not appear in RDF - "just" two branches needed or FILTER because "=" works across plain literals without language tag (SPARQL calls these "simple literals" to distinguish from plain literals with language tag). > >> Well, the entire world does not use xsd typing, they tend not to use >> typing at all:-) But yes, just as the string 123.456 is a syntactic >> sugar in Turtle, for example, for a float literal, we could do the >> same. > > xsd:decimal, not a float. I stand corrected... Ivan > > Andy > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 7 March 2011 09:04:46 UTC