W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Re: Other issues?

From: David Wood <david.wood@talis.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:41:31 -0500
Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <06225565-DFB6-4A29-99DD-CDEB28C177B2@talis.com>
To: Mischa Tuffield <mischa.tuffield@garlik.com>
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Misc_Tasks

Regards,
Dave




On Mar 9, 2011, at 12:37, Mischa Tuffield wrote:

> Hi All, 
> 
> A couple of questions for the group:
> 
> 1) I wonder if there is a place already on the wiki for capturing "other issues", the miscellaneous ones basically? For example, the URIRef vs IRI issue. 
> 
> 2) And whether or not the RDFa spec[1] is in or out of scope of this working group, as it is not listed in the charter as one of the documents which the group will be looking to update[1]? The reason I mention this is again, if we end up in a world where both SPARQL and RDF (lets say the Turtle serialisation) are using IRIs, developers would have to use a different URI encoding library for SPARQL & Turtle, from the one they would be using if there were to be serialising to RDFa. 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Mischa *goes off to look into the back-compatibility of URIRefs to IRIs (any pointers existing work comparing the definitions would be much appreciated)
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/01/rdf-wg-charter#deliverables 
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#T_URI_reference 
> 
> ___________________________________
> Mischa Tuffield PhD
> Email: mischa.tuffield@garlik.com
> Homepage - http://mmt.me.uk/
> Garlik Limited, 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW
> +44(0)845 652 2824  http://www.garlik.com/
> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
> 


Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 17:42:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:04 UTC