W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:45:33 +0000
Message-ID: <4D71799D.3020303@webr3.org>
To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]

yes, a main reason being, if we don't, somebody else will, and possibly 
a few different people, which would lead to interop problems and require 
standardization in the future. So may as well get there first.
Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 23:46:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:03 UTC