W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Re: [Turtle] Re: bang ! in turtle

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:10:56 +0000
Message-ID: <4D6E4FF0.2060408@webr3.org>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
CC: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> On 3/2/2011 5:15 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
>> On 2011-03-01, at 17:04, Ivan Herman wrote:
>>
>>> As a _personal view_ I would be very cautious in adding new things
>>> to Turtle. What we should do is to standardize a widely used
>>> language and we should be careful not to require existing parser
>>> deployments to do additional development. If there are ambiguities
>>> and errors (eg, the issue of "18." vs "18 .") these of course
>>> should be fixed but we should be very careful in going beyond
>>> that.
>>
>> Very strong +1.
>>
>> It is my firm belief that working groups should standardise common
>> practice. The alternative is working groups that drag on for years,
>> and tend to produce recs that are not as useful as they should be.
> 
> My experiences and beliefs align with what Steve and Ivan say here.
> 
> ("+1")

possibly surprisingly, +1 also.

caveat: super-turtle is needed also
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 14:13:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:03 UTC