- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:10:56 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> On 3/2/2011 5:15 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
>> On 2011-03-01, at 17:04, Ivan Herman wrote:
>>
>>> As a _personal view_ I would be very cautious in adding new things
>>> to Turtle. What we should do is to standardize a widely used
>>> language and we should be careful not to require existing parser
>>> deployments to do additional development. If there are ambiguities
>>> and errors (eg, the issue of "18." vs "18 .") these of course
>>> should be fixed but we should be very careful in going beyond
>>> that.
>>
>> Very strong +1.
>>
>> It is my firm belief that working groups should standardise common
>> practice. The alternative is working groups that drag on for years,
>> and tend to produce recs that are not as useful as they should be.
>
> My experiences and beliefs align with what Steve and Ivan say here.
>
> ("+1")
possibly surprisingly, +1 also.
caveat: super-turtle is needed also
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 14:13:01 UTC