- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 15:11:58 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 3 Mar 2011, at 14:55, Ivan Herman wrote: > This has some relevance to our discussion: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/void/ > > My first immediate question would be (and I am sure Richard or Michael can answer that): is there a fundamental difference between what we called g-box in the past few days and 'dataset' as used in the VoID document? Just to add to our mess on terms used...:-) We have a very loose definition of “dataset”: http://www.w3.org/TR/void/#dataset I don't think it really helps us here. I guess that any collection of one or more g-snaps and/or g-boxes can be a void:Dataset. One reason why I want to see this group nail down the g-box/g-snap/g-text terminology in a REC is that it would provide a *much* more solid foundation for things like VoID, where we currently have to hand-wave a lot for lack of citable standard terminology. Best, Richard > > Ivan > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2011 15:12:34 UTC