W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Which WG?

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:16:35 +0000
Message-ID: <4D78F963.7050303@webr3.org>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
CC: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Hi Richard,

Just a quick comment..

Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> The main motivation would be as a result format for CONSTRUCT and DESCRIBE queries against SPARQL stores. So, server-side implementors would be SPARQL store vendors.

I have to say I'm getting a little confused, it appears that the two 
things you passionately want to see this WG to provide, is a turtle like 
format for dumping out RDF Datasets, and a JSON format for dumping out 
CONSTRUCT and DESCRIBE sparql results.

Why here and not the SPARQL WG?


Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 16:17:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:04 UTC