On Mar 23, 2011, at 15:46 , Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>
>> # These are not strict Turtle where everything
>> # must be "subject-predicate" form.
>> # They are SPARQL.
>>
>> ("a" "b" "c" ) .
>
> This should be flagged a little more clearly as "NOT RDF". A mapping
> can reject this one and still be 100% RDF.
>
>> [ :p (1 2) , (3 4) ] .
I have not looked at the grammar (Andy, obviously, has) but that surprised me greatly. But RDFlib parses this without problem, to triples, each of them having a list as an object (ie, a bnode with first and next, etc)
Ivan
>
> Oh that's really not in Turtle? Sad, if true.
>
>>
>> Attached:
>> D.ttl (the data above)
>> D.nt (converted to N-triples)
>
> Brilliant! And cruel! I'm trying to imagine Tom sitting on the
> plane sorting this out against the various specs. He might find he'd
> rather just write the code.
>
> -- Sandro
>
>
----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 15:04:25 UTC