- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 09:24:09 -0600
- To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Mar 5, 2011, at 5:35 AM, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/12 > > Raised by: Ivan Herman > On product: Cleanup tasks > > At the moment we have plain literals, rdf:plainLiteral, and xsd:string literals. They are very very close to one another but they are officially different. In practice this means that, eg, SPARQL queries have to have a three branch UNION to handle all of these. Worth looking at some sort of a reconciliation of these. +100 We really should clean up this mess. I suggest a draconian solution: deprecate all but xsd:string. Untyped literals were just a mistake, it seems clear from hindsight. rdf:plainLiteral was a brave attempt to clean up the mess, but it is a crock because it had to work within the existing specs. We have a chance to put all this right. We can allow language tags on xsd:string literals and we can even allow the plain literal syntax to stay, but treat it as syntactic sugar for an xsd:string literal. And we can incorporate xsd:string datatyping into plain RDF entailment. All of this is inelegant at the theoretical level (but no more than having XMLLIteral in there) but supremely practical, since the entire world knows what xsd:string means and uses xsd typing. Pat > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Saturday, 5 March 2011 15:25:59 UTC