W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle?

From: Yves Raimond <Yves.Raimond@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:20:07 +0100
To: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110330162006.GW25836@dvbstreamer.national.core.bbc.co.uk>
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +0100, Nathan wrote:
> RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> >ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle?
> 
> Is there a case where it's ambiguous?

Apparently it is - all Turtle parsers have tried interpret it differently. However we end up fixing it, that definitely proves this part of the grammar needs to be more specific.

Best,
y

> 
> must be an integer (else not a valid turtle doc):
>   <e:f> <b:f> 18.
>   <e:f> <b:f> "e".
> 
> must be an integer (else not a valid turtle doc):
>   <e:f> <b:f> 18.
> 
> must be an decimal (else not a valid turtle doc):
>   <e:f> <b:f> 18., "e".
> 
> must be an decimal (else not a valid turtle doc):
>   <e:f> <b:f> 18..
>   <e:f> <b:f> "e".
> 
> must be an decimal (else not a valid turtle doc):
>   <e:f> <b:f> 18..
> 
> Which case is under question?
> 
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2011 16:20:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:04 UTC