- From: Yves Raimond <Yves.Raimond@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:20:07 +0100
- To: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +0100, Nathan wrote: > RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > >ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle? > > Is there a case where it's ambiguous? Apparently it is - all Turtle parsers have tried interpret it differently. However we end up fixing it, that definitely proves this part of the grammar needs to be more specific. Best, y > > must be an integer (else not a valid turtle doc): > <e:f> <b:f> 18. > <e:f> <b:f> "e". > > must be an integer (else not a valid turtle doc): > <e:f> <b:f> 18. > > must be an decimal (else not a valid turtle doc): > <e:f> <b:f> 18., "e". > > must be an decimal (else not a valid turtle doc): > <e:f> <b:f> 18.. > <e:f> <b:f> "e". > > must be an decimal (else not a valid turtle doc): > <e:f> <b:f> 18.. > > Which case is under question? >
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2011 16:20:35 UTC