Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"

On Mar 18, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Gavin Carothers wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
> [... snip ...]
>> If we need g-snap, which I'm sure we do, then perhaps each g-text
>> encodes/serializes a g-snap, and several g-texts may all encode/serialize
>> equivalent g-snaps, but that requires g-snap equality to be determined.
>> 
>> O, actually I quite like that, then all g-snap's are anonymous abstract sets
>> of rdf triples, and it's the set of g-texts (g-box) that is associated with
>> a name.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
> 
> That's mostly what the diagram I drew shows. I couldn't figure out how
> to draw/explain anything else. The name is attached to g-box. If you
> do need to keep track of versions you can create g-boxes that each
> only ever contain one g-snap.

I think they contain one g-text which is a serialization of a g-snap, actually. Or at any rate, that is what they emit when http-poked.

Pat

> I that's sort of how the Talis API works
> at the moment as well. (Someone from Tailis can speak better to that).
> 
> Cheers,
> Gavin
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes

Received on Sunday, 20 March 2011 00:06:55 UTC