W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Re: Generic "Graph" Use Cases

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:05:04 +0000
Message-ID: <4D74F420.8070806@webr3.org>
CC: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Nathan wrote:
> Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>> How about this: Let's assume I have a g-box that for whatever reason 
>> has been “sealed” and made immutable. Is there any RDF statement that 
>> you'd possibly like to make about this immutable g-box that you 
>> wouldn't want to make about the g-snap sealed therein, or vice versa?
> no :) a sealed g-box is perfect
> now all we need is a way to seal the state of a g-box yesterday, which 
> is in a different state today.

and of course, pass by value rather than reference (so to speak) - which 
is the primary g-snap case, so you don't have to go looking something 
up, only to find it's either gone or changed, or because it's entirely 
impractical to mint x many URIs and host x many persistent docs, when 
you could just quote, annotate and send.
Received on Monday, 7 March 2011 15:06:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:03 UTC