- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:21:41 +0000
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDF Working Group <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-03-23, at 14:58, Manu Sporny wrote: > On 03/23/2011 10:40 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/JSON_User_Segments#Potentials_that_Manu_Sees >>> >>> Notice the expansion of the green box to the left. I think accomplishing >>> that goal is very do-able, I'll try to explain more (with examples) when >>> I get some time to write about it. >> >> Um, I don't think that's right. > > Maybe :) > >> A-3/4/5/6 --- why do column A people, who don't need or want RDF, need a >> way to transform JSON to Triples? > > They don't, but the publishers that want to reach the audience that > wants RDF /could/ encode the information in a way that doesn't bother > Column A people, but also meets the needs of column B people. That is - > one solution is applicable to both Column A and Column B. That is, the > markup looks like this to both columns: > > { > "#": { ... MAPPINGS ... } > "name": "Sandro Hawke" > } I honestly don't see much value here. We're a very RDF heavy company, and use JSON from the Twitter API for e.g., but I've never thought it would be helpful to get RDF out - we'd have to turn it into something else anyway, handling graphs in most mainstream programming languages is a pain! We do, in some applications, turn data From Twitter into RDF so we can put it in a triplestore, but the RDF we generate is not that similar in structure or content to the JSON data we get from Twitter. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2011 22:22:15 UTC