- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 22:16:20 +0000
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- CC: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDF Working Group <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 06/03/11 21:58, Nathan wrote: > Hi Richard, > > I agree, needs written up in a usecases for json wiki page, if you can't > wait that long then do see the thread which started here: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Feb/0072.html > > What you mention is "RDF in JSON", something which nobody seems that > keen to do, although I still maintain we need both! So do I. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Feb/0112.html Andy > > Best, > > Nathan > > Richard Cyganiak wrote: >> Hi Manu, >> >> I'm sorry if I missed anything, I didn't follow [JSON] too closely, >> but has there been any discussion/writeup on use cases for RDF-in-JSON? >> >> I'm tempted to argue that the format should be the simplest thing that >> could possibly work. Perhaps a list of objects, each with "s", "p", >> "o" keys, plus bits for node types, datatypes, language tags. >> >> My impression is that some in the TF would strongly disagree with >> that, and have something completely different in mind, and I'd like to >> understand what they actually want to *do* with the format. >> >> I think a wiki page that lists use cases would be terrific. >> >> Best, >> Richard >> >> >> >> On 6 Mar 2011, at 20:46, Manu Sporny wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have ACTION-16[1], which is to effectively summarize positions on RDF >>> in JSON in an attempt to figure out the starting document for the JSON >>> work. While attempting to summarize positions, I realized very quickly >>> that not everyone in the Task Force had responded and even when they >>> did, I found it difficult to tease the nuances out of their statements. >>> >>> So, instead I've placed a quick survey up on the wiki. I hope that this >>> will be more accurate than attempting to summarize positions (and >>> inevitably getting someones position wrong). >>> >>> I have already sent this link out to the RDF WG JSON TF (acronym >>> c-c-c-combo!) >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-JSON#RDF_in_JSON_Design_Requirements >>> >>> >>> If you are not in the JSON TF but would like to express your position, >>> please do so by following the link above and noting your preferences >>> under the section titled "RDF in JSON Design Requirements". >>> >>> -- manu >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/16 >>> >>> -- >>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) >>> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >>> blog: Towards Universal Web Commerce >>> http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/01/31/web-commerce/ >>> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Sunday, 6 March 2011 22:17:01 UTC