- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:44:37 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: Fabien Gandon <fabien.gandon@inria.fr>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 02/03/11 14:09, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > The SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol (near but not yet at Last Call) > specifies that a GET against the IRI of a graph in a graph store should > return the contents of that graph. See > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/#http-get . > > If this WG feels strongly otherwise, it would make a lot of sense to > setup a cross-WG coordination group as soon as possible, as the SPARQL > WG hopes to move to Last Call within a few weeks or so. > > Lee What is more, the IRI might be http://server/graphs/graph57 in other words it's simply a normal HTTP GET on a URI just as if it's done by having a an RDF/XML file on a web server. [[ Background: The above is direct naming. There is another form of indirect naming: http://server/store?graph=http://example/data and it returns the graph associated with http://example/data in the graph store. ]] Andy
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2011 09:45:26 UTC