- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:34:02 -0500
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
After re-reading the feedback comments on the RDF in JSON Design Requirements, it seems as if there are a number of misunderstandings about what is possible in an RDF in JSON format: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-JSON#RDF_in_JSON_Design_Requirements "Time permitting, not a top priority" "nice to have but should not consume this team's resources" "Seems out-of-scope; do existing RDF-in-JSON solutions already have such mechanisms?" "time permitting" "highly desirable if there's time" etc. You could read this feedback in two ways. The first is that it takes time to come to consensus on each feature and we may need to cut the feature because we can't come to consensus on it - that response is perfectly valid. The second assumes that there is no working technical solution and that the group will have to solve the technical problem first and then come to consensus on the feature - I don't think this response is valid. I was careful to not write design requirements for features that did not have at least one implemented solution. None of the design requirements are proposing features that are not implemented in at least one of the proposed RDF in JSON serialization formats. That is, if you think that there is a major/untested/unimplemented technical hurdle or challenge to one of the design requirements, you may want to read through the serialization proposals. I think we're getting to the point where some of us may argue vehemently for or against a particular feature under the false premise that no technical solution exists. This may send us down a rat hole and will most likely waste precious telecon time. If you are not familiar with all of the JSON serialization formats and are going to participate in the discussion, please make sure that you have a handle on most of the features that are provided by each serialization format: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-JSON#Inputs If you only have limited time, I believe just looking at the following 4 documents will be sufficient to understand the scope of the features provided by the various serialization formats. JSON-LD : http://json-ld.org/spec/ED/20110201/ RDF/JSON: http://n2.talis.com/wiki/RDF_JSON_Specification JSN3 : http://webr3.org/apps/specs/jsn3/ JTriples: http://www.w3.org/wiki/JTriples -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Payment Standards and Competition http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/02/28/payment-standards/
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 20:34:34 UTC