W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:27:20 +0000
Cc: RDF Working Group <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <187DB677-F4C7-4B9C-B7B8-5F9ADA201D52@cyganiak.de>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>

On 9 Mar 2011, at 19:50, Manu Sporny wrote:
> I've split that use case into two separate use cases.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-JSON#Migrating_to_Semantic_Web_Services
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-JSON#Generalized_storage_of_Semantic_Data_in_Web_Services
> 
> Rather than attempting to explain the differences between the two, is it
> clear what the differences between the two are by reading the wiki text?

Yes, this works for me. There is quite a bit of overlap between different use cases now, but that's not a problem.

I've added one more use case:

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-JSON#Treating_JSON_data_as_RDF_for_use_in_Data_Spaces

It can be argued that this story has nothing to do with defining a JSON-based RDF exchange format. I added it anyways because it's in the general space and highlights one more thing that people want to do with JSON and RDF.

Best,
Richard




> 
> -- manu
> 
> -- 
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Payment Standards and Competition
> http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/02/28/payment-standards/
> 
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 11:27:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:04 UTC