- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:09:40 +0000
- To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 25/03/11 13:53, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > RDF-ISSUE-16 (Base JSON Grammar): What is the normative serialization of the JSON grammar? [RDF JSON] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/16 > > Raised by: Manu Sporny > On product: RDF JSON > > There are currently three JSON grammar serializations, which one should this Working Group use as the basis for the RDF/JSON serialization: > > * RFC4627: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt > * ECMA-262 5th Edition: http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/ECMA-262.pdf > * json.org: http://json.org/ How do they differ? Are there real world examples of collisions? > I assert that we should use RFC4627 because it is correct and simple for parser developers to read. And because it defines application/json so it is the on-the-wire definition. Andy (And because it does not even mention escaping "/" in strings except for the backwards compatibility bit in the grammar) > > > >
Received on Friday, 25 March 2011 14:10:18 UTC