- From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:47:30 +0100
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Richard, Great summary, including the "unsure where to go from here" bit. I am very much on the "higher-vision-camp" side, with my limited world view I currently don't see much added value of a simple triple objects array, but could be convinced of the other way (would these triple objects be microsyntax-based for complex types, or language attributes?). Isn't this just N-Tripes in a JSON envelope? Two formats would be confusing. +1 It (JSON triples-objects) wouldn't be a game changer. +1 Whom do we want to do a favor? Publishers? Consumers? What would be the added value over vanilla JSON for both, the consumer and the publisher side? I think the F2F is gonna be interesting... Thanks, Tom -- Thomas Steiner, Research Scientist, Google Inc. http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 15:50:17 UTC