W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Re: [Turtle] Misc initial thoughts

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:34:34 +0000
Message-ID: <4D6E9BCA.20206@webr3.org>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
CC: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 2 Mar 2011, at 17:31, Nathan wrote:
>> Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>>> I think having a proper spec for this “N-Triples done right” is a great plan, including support for quads, IRI resolution, UTF-8, and proper media type.
>>> However I wouldn't necessarily see it as a subset of Turtle. I'd prefer for Turtle to remain as it is defined now, as a triples-only format without multigraphs/quads.
>> quads != triples surely, perhaps there needs to be two then, N-Triples and N-Quads.
> 
> As I said, “N-Triples done right” should include support for quads.

q's
1: what would the 4th bit be?
2: how would one guarantee or ask for only triples?

> I don't understand why you'd want two specs.

well because I see that 3 != 4, and that they are different?
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 19:35:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:03 UTC