Re: [Turtle] Misc initial thoughts

Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 2 Mar 2011, at 17:31, Nathan wrote:
>> Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>>> I think having a proper spec for this “N-Triples done right” is a great plan, including support for quads, IRI resolution, UTF-8, and proper media type.
>>> However I wouldn't necessarily see it as a subset of Turtle. I'd prefer for Turtle to remain as it is defined now, as a triples-only format without multigraphs/quads.
>> quads != triples surely, perhaps there needs to be two then, N-Triples and N-Quads.
> 
> As I said, “N-Triples done right” should include support for quads.

q's
1: what would the 4th bit be?
2: how would one guarantee or ask for only triples?

> I don't understand why you'd want two specs.

well because I see that 3 != 4, and that they are different?

Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 19:35:35 UTC