public-webapps@w3.org from January to March 2015 by author

Adam Klein

• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: Custom element lifecycle callbacks (Friday, 9 January)

Alice Boxhall

• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 30 January)

Anders Rundgren

• Re: Proposal for a Permissions API (Sunday, 22 March)
• Access to localhost to be outlawed? (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: [manifest] RE: Manifest for web application; review deadline March 5 (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Staying on Topic [Was: Re: WebPortable/PlatformProprietary - An Established Concept] (Thursday, 19 February)
• WebPortable/PlatformProprietary - An Established Concept (Thursday, 19 February)
• Mozilla on Privileged Hosted Apps (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: [WebCrypto.Next] Any ideas on how to proceed? (Wednesday, 18 February)
• [WebCrypto.Next] Any ideas on how to proceed? (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Updated: Running trusted code in the untrusted web (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Running trusted code in the untrusted web - A writeup (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• The futile war between Native and Web (Sunday, 15 February)

Andrei Popov

• RE: [Unbearable] IETF seeking feedback on proposed "Token Binding" Working Group (Wednesday, 11 February)

Andy Heath

• Re: IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 18 March at 21:00Z (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 18 March at 21:00Z (Tuesday, 10 March)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: CORS performance (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Custom elements: synchronous constructors and cloning (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: Custom elements: synchronous constructors and cloning (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Monday, 23 February)
• Custom elements: synchronous constructors and cloning (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: CORS performance proposal (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: CORS performance proposal (Saturday, 21 February)
• Re: CORS performance proposal (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Thursday, 19 February)
• CORS performance proposal (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Tuesday, 17 February)
• CORS performance (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: [Unbearable] IETF seeking feedback on proposed "Token Binding" Working Group (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: IETF seeking feedback on proposed "Token Binding" Working Group (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: [webcomponents]: Let's reach consensus on Shadow DOM (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Toward more productive f2f meetings [Was:Re: Feedback needed for April 2015 face-to-face location by *January 27, 2015*] (Monday, 2 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Monday, 2 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Monday, 2 February)
• Re: [clipboard API] platform integration stuff - in spec or out of scope? (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 29 January)
• Custom elements and the HTML parser (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Adopting a Custom Element into Another Document (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Adopting a Custom Element into Another Document (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Adopting a Custom Element into Another Document (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Adopting a Custom Element into Another Document (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Custom element lifecycle callbacks (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Custom element lifecycle callbacks (Friday, 9 January)
• Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Custom element lifecycle callbacks (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Custom element lifecycle callbacks (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Custom element lifecycle callbacks (Friday, 9 January)
• Custom element lifecycle callbacks (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: ES6 and upgrading custom elements (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: ES6 and upgrading custom elements (Tuesday, 6 January)
• Re: ES6 and upgrading custom elements (Tuesday, 6 January)
• Re: ES6 and upgrading custom elements (Tuesday, 6 January)
• ES6 and upgrading custom elements (Tuesday, 6 January)
• Re: custom elements without the dash (Monday, 5 January)
• Re: custom elements without the dash (Monday, 5 January)

Arthur Barstow

• Re: [websockets] Test results available (Thursday, 26 March)
• [websockets] Test results available (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications" (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28 (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28 (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications" (Tuesday, 24 March)
• CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28 (Saturday, 21 March)
• Re: CfC: publish WG Note of UI Events; deadline November 14 (Thursday, 12 March)
• FYI: IETF Token Binding Working Group formed (tokbind) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• [admin] Registration for April 24 2015 Web Components f2f meeting; deadline April 10 (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: CORS explained simply (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: Staying on Topic [Was: Re: WebPortable/PlatformProprietary - An Established Concept] (Thursday, 19 February)
• Staying on Topic [Was: Re: WebPortable/PlatformProprietary - An Established Concept] (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: Web Components F2F in April 2015 (Thursday, 19 February)
• RfC: Manifest for web application; review deadline March 5 (Friday, 13 February)
• IETF seeking feedback on proposed "Token Binding" Working Group (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Standards wonks and developers working together [Was: Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest] (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Staying on topic [Was: Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest] (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Violation of mail list policy [Was: Fwd: Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest] (Monday, 9 February)
• Mail list Etiquette [Was: Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive] (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Friday, 6 February)
• PSA: publishing new WD of Service Workers on February 5 (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Toward more productive f2f meetings [Was:Re: Feedback needed for April 2015 face-to-face location by *January 27, 2015*] (Monday, 2 February)
• Re: [IndexedDB] link to Editor's draft is a 404 (Monday, 2 February)
• CfC: publish Wide Review Draft of Manifest for web application; deadline Feb 5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• [admin] Important: Feedback needed for April 2015 face-to-face location by *January 27, 2015* (Sunday, 25 January)
• FYI: Change in my affiliation (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: <webview> API common subset (Friday, 23 January)
• RfC: Manifest for web application (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Packaging on the Web; deadline November 3 (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Tuesday, 13 January)
• PSA: Indexed Database API is a W3C Recommendation (Thursday, 8 January)
• FYI: Deep linking (Wednesday, 7 January)

Aryeh Gregor

• Re: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: [Selection] Support of Multiple Selection (was: Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference?) (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: [Selection] Support of Multiple Selection (was: Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference?) (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: [Selection] Support of Multiple Selection (was: Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference?) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: [Selection] Support of Multiple Selection (was: Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference?) (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Saturday, 10 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Friday, 9 January)

Ashley Gullen

• Standardising canvas-driven background images (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Showing <dialog> from HTML import (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Showing <dialog> from HTML import (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)

Austin William Wright

• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: CORS performance (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Friday, 6 February)

Ben Peters

• RE: [clipboard API] platform integration stuff - in spec or out of scope? (Friday, 13 February)
• [Selection] Support of Multiple Selection (was: Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference?) (Monday, 12 January)
• RE: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Tuesday, 6 January)

Benjamin Goering

• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Thursday, 5 February)

Benjamin Lesh

• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Thursday, 12 March)
• template namespace attribute proposal (Thursday, 12 March)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: CORS performance proposal (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: CORS performance proposal (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Wednesday, 14 January)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [websockets] Test results available (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [websockets] Test results available (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [websockets] Test results available (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: Custom elements: synchronous constructors and cloning (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Adopting a Custom Element into Another Document (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Saturday, 10 January)
• Re: Custom element lifecycle callbacks (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Custom element lifecycle callbacks (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Custom element lifecycle callbacks (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Custom element lifecycle callbacks (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Custom element lifecycle callbacks (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Wednesday, 7 January)

Brad Hill

• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: Security use cases for packaging (Thursday, 29 January)

Brendan Eich

• Re: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Wednesday, 11 February)

Brian Birtles

• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Tuesday, 17 March)

Brian Kardell

• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Friday, 9 January)

Brian Smith

• Re: CORS performance proposal (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)

Bruce Lawson

• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 29 January)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 28373] New: FilePropertyBag can inherit from BlobPropertyBag (Monday, 30 March)
• [Bug 28211] [Shadow]: A syntax for loading/parsing shadow trees directly from HTML (Friday, 27 March)
• [Bug 26238] [new feature] Add follow redirects back (Friday, 27 March)
• [Bug 28353] New: [Shadow]: Use a parent/child relationship in the composed tree for some elements, i.e. <ol>/<li> (Friday, 27 March)
• [Bug 28332] Remove any border and padding from fullscreen iframes (Wednesday, 25 March)
• [Bug 28332] New: Remove any border and padding from fullscreen iframes (Wednesday, 25 March)
• [Bug 27552] Make execCommand("InsertImage", false, "") insert an img element with no src attribute (Monday, 23 March)
• [Bug 27552] Make execCommand("InsertImage", false, "") insert an img element with no src attribute (Monday, 23 March)
• [Bug 25968] Needs clearer definition of virtual keyboard's KeyboardEvent.code value if it doesn't emulate physical key event completely (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 25485] D3E and corelation with DOM4(W3C)/DOM(WHATWAG) and DOM3 Core (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 28119] Reference to createEvent("FocusEvent") (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 25928] Converge with CSSOM-View (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 25967] Testing DOM L3 Events (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 26218] When .getModifierState("OS") should be true? (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 27825] DOM Level 3 KeyboardEvent key Values specification does not include core key values (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 27337] For synthetic activation, should the original event still be dispatched? (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 26611] [Proposal] Add "Zoom" event (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 28029] Mouse coordinates represented in CSS pixels do not account for retina displays with window.devicePixelRatio > 1. (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 25844] Clarify or change the use of "default action" to avoid confusion (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 25927] Specify the Event Loop integration for various non-deprecated events, incl. hit testing (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 27558] Specify MouseEvent.which (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 27129] [D3E-key]: Separator (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 27333] Most user agents (Chrome, Firefox) seem to distinguish between space and enter. Enter submits the form, even for radio buttons, space selects the checkbox. (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 26227] Define that click doesn't fire on disabled elements (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 27827] Need to remove input/beforeinput event info from D3E and point to input event spec (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 26141] [D3E-Key] Needs more explicit explanation of "MediaSelect", "LaunchMediaPlayer" and "MediaApps" (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 27996] [D3E-code] KeyboardEvent code spec should have featurephone section (Saturday, 21 March)
• [Bug 28246] New: [Shadow]: Disable event capturing through a ShadowRoot (Friday, 20 March)
• [Bug 27222] [Shadow]: Define how attributes are handled in shadow DOM (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [Bug 27931] Override 'flex' and 'transform' styling (Tuesday, 17 March)
• [Bug 28211] New: [Shadow]: A syntax for loading/parsing shadow trees directly from HTML (Friday, 13 March)
• [Bug 28069] [Shadow]: Should Text.getDestinationInsertionPoints() be specified? (Tuesday, 10 March)
• [Bug 28185] [Shadow]: TextNode should have getDestinationInsertionPoints() (Tuesday, 10 March)
• [Bug 28185] New: [Shadow]: TextNode should have getDestinationInsertionPoints() (Tuesday, 10 March)
• [Bug 28157] [Shadow]: Link to CSS Scoping module spec? (Monday, 9 March)
• [Bug 28158] New: [Custom]: inflexible extends as fixed element type (Saturday, 7 March)
• [Bug 28157] New: [Shadow]: Link to CSS Scoping module spec? (Saturday, 7 March)
• [Bug 28008] [Shadow] Should "Events that are Always Stopped" include destination insertion points? (Tuesday, 3 March)
• [Bug 28117] New: Clarify timeout in case Preflighted CORS requests (Sunday, 1 March)
• [Bug 28092] New: [Custom]: Clarify in informative note that cloning/importing also enqueues created callback (Tuesday, 24 February)
• [Bug 28086] New: [Shadow] (assuming iframes should work inside shadow DOM) Should the contentWindow objects of iframes in shadow DOM show up in window.frames? (Monday, 23 February)
• [Bug 28079] New: [Shadow]: inappropriate reference to CSS3-UI nav-index spec in focus navigation order (Monday, 23 February)
• [Bug 28069] New: [Shadow]: Should Text.getDestinationInsertionPoints() be specified? (Saturday, 21 February)
• [Bug 28067] New: DOMStringList has been removed from DOM (Saturday, 21 February)
• [Bug 28054] New: Focus on shadow host should slide to its inner focusable node (Thursday, 19 February)
• [Bug 28051] [imports]: showing <dialog> from import (Wednesday, 18 February)
• [Bug 28031] Does the destination insertion points include Shadow IP without older trees? (Monday, 16 February)
• [Bug 28031] New: Does the destination insertion points include Shadow IP without older trees? (Monday, 16 February)
• [Bug 28008] New: [Shadow] Should "Events that are Always Stopped" include destination insertion points? (Friday, 13 February)
• [Bug 27994] New: [Shadow]: Distribution result usage examples (Tuesday, 10 February)
• [Bug 27986] New: Specify exact length of array returned by Navigator.getGamepads() (Monday, 9 February)
• [Bug 27978] New: [Custom]: attachedCallback has no protocol for indicating that the custom tag is not applicable in this context (Saturday, 7 February)
• [Bug 27977] New: [Custom]: mixin pattern: custom elements should be able to extend any base tag with is= (Saturday, 7 February)
• [Bug 27976] New: [Custom]: type extensions should be available as custom tags, not only through <baseTag is="..."> (Saturday, 7 February)
• [Bug 27975] New: [Custom]: No way to unregister a component (Saturday, 7 February)
• [Bug 27965] New: [Shadow]: Shadow host with tabindex=-1, all descendent tree should be ignored for tab navigation (Thursday, 5 February)
• [Bug 27931] New: Override 'flex' and 'transform' styling (Friday, 30 January)
• [Bug 27915] New: Clients of WebSockets are not NTP synced (and there is no NTP-alike spec) (Wednesday, 28 January)
• [Bug 27914] New: [Custom]: Typo instantation ---> instantiation (Wednesday, 28 January)
• [Bug 27876] [Shadow] It is not defined what event.path actually should return (Friday, 23 January)
• [Bug 26181] Spec should specify the presentation of the array returned by navigator.getGamepads() w.r.t "holes" (Thursday, 22 January)
• [Bug 27876] New: [Shadow] It is not defined what event.path actually should return (Wednesday, 21 January)
• [Bug 27865] New: Interaction issues between fullscreen and <dialog> (Tuesday, 20 January)
• [Bug 27863] New: Not need to specify moving element in top layer and fullscreen stack (Tuesday, 20 January)
• [Bug 27844] [Shadow]: Element.createShadowRoot() throws an exception for some elements (Monday, 19 January)
• [Bug 27844] New: [Shadow]: Element.createShadowRoot() throws an exception for some elements (Friday, 16 January)
• [Bug 27836] New: Scripts in HTML Imports should be scoped to the import (treat imports as script modules) (Thursday, 15 January)
• [Bug 27835] New: registerElement() should be scoped to modules (Wednesday, 14 January)
• [Bug 27823] We should consider dropping [NoInterfaceObject] from XMLHttpRequestEventTarget (Wednesday, 14 January)
• [Bug 27829] New: [Shadow]: Update ShadowRoot to have elementsFromPoint and caretPositionFromPoint (Wednesday, 14 January)
• [Bug 25223] IDB exposes GC behavior (Tuesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 27712] IndexedDB: Array comparison algorithm doesn't handle empty arrays (Tuesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 27823] New: We should consider dropping [NoInterfaceObject] from XMLHttpRequestEventTarget (Tuesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 27709] Dictionary MouseEventInit uses keyword attribute for its members (Tuesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 27727] Remove DOMError from IDB (Sunday, 11 January)
• [Bug 26904] Introduce typedef for IDBKeyPath, use it (Friday, 9 January)
• [Bug 27785] [Shadow]: broken link in draft spec section 9.3 (Friday, 9 January)
• [Bug 27785] New: [Shadow]: broken link in draft spec section 9.3 (Thursday, 8 January)
• [Bug 27727] Remove DOMError from IDB (Wednesday, 7 January)
• [Bug 27780] New: [Custom]: "All Algorithms in One Diagram" (Wednesday, 7 January)
• [Bug 27775] New: [Shadow]: Define the behavior of *closed* shadow trees. (Wednesday, 7 January)
• [Bug 27770] New: [Custom]: Improve the wording in element upgrade algorithm (Tuesday, 6 January)
• [Bug 27769] New: [Custom]: ES6 section needs to be updated (Tuesday, 6 January)
• [Bug 27768] New: [Custom]: "Parsing Custom Elements" (Tuesday, 6 January)
• [Bug 27544] [IndexedDB] "and and" typo (Tuesday, 6 January)
• [Bug 27762] New: [Custom]: what happens with Unresolved Elements when removed from the tree? (Tuesday, 6 January)
• [Bug 27757] New: [Shadow]: how is the autofocus attribute supposed to be handled? (Monday, 5 January)
• [Bug 27751] New: [Custom]: suggest note on requirements (Monday, 5 January)
• [Bug 25813] [Custom]: Throw Exception when EXTENDS and PROTOTYPE have a mismatch (Monday, 5 January)
• [Bug 27727] New: Remove DOMError from IDB (Friday, 2 January)
• [Bug 27721] New: Partial interfaces must not inherit (Thursday, 1 January)

chaals@yandex-team.ru

• Re: Better focus support for Shadow DOM (Thursday, 19 February)
• Fwd: Getting to Zaragoza (may be harder) (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Feedback needed for April 2015 face-to-face location by *January 27, 2015* (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Feedback needed for April 2015 face-to-face location by *January 27, 2015* (Tuesday, 20 January)
• IME API… (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Better focus support for Shadow DOM (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Better focus support for Shadow DOM (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• [Manifest] Navigation Scope is unclear (Thursday, 8 January)

Chris Bateman

• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Monday, 2 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Saturday, 31 January)

Chris Palmer

• Re: Security use cases for packaging (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Security use cases for packaging (Thursday, 29 January)

Christiansen, Kenneth R

• RE: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications" (Friday, 20 March)
• RE: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications" (Friday, 20 March)
• RE: [appmanifest] No direction metadata for 'name' (etc.) [I18N-ISSUE-416] (Friday, 20 March)
• RE: [manifest] RE: Manifest for web application; review deadline March 5 (Friday, 6 March)

Dale Harvey

• Re: CORS performance proposal (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)

Daniel Freedman

• Re: [Shadow] Q: Removable shadows (and an idea for lightweight shadows)? (Thursday, 26 March)

Daniel Kahn Gillmor

• Re: Security use cases for packaging (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Security use cases for packaging (Friday, 30 January)

David Leon Gil

• Re: [WebCrypto.Next] Any ideas on how to proceed? (Wednesday, 18 February)

David Rajchenbach-Teller

• Re: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Thursday, 12 February)

Deian Stefan

• Re: Security use cases for packaging (Friday, 30 January)

Devdatta Akhawe

• Re: CORS performance (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: Security use cases for packaging (Thursday, 29 January)

Dimitri Glazkov

• Re: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: Extending HTMLCanvasElement in Custom Element issue (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Custom elements: synchronous constructors and cloning (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: Custom elements: synchronous constructors and cloning (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: Custom elements: synchronous constructors and cloning (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: Web Components F2F in April 2015 (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Web Components F2F in April 2015 (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Web Components F2F in April 2015 (Thursday, 19 February)
• Web Components F2F in April 2015 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: Showing <dialog> from HTML import (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: Base Template (Was Re: Minimum viable custom elements) (Thursday, 12 February)
• [webcomponents]: Let's reach consensus on Shadow DOM (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 2 February)
• Re: Toward more productive f2f meetings [Was:Re: Feedback needed for April 2015 face-to-face location by *January 27, 2015*] (Monday, 2 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Custom element lifecycle callbacks (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: ES6 and upgrading custom elements (Tuesday, 6 January)
• Re: ES6 and upgrading custom elements (Tuesday, 6 January)
• Re: ES6 and upgrading custom elements (Tuesday, 6 January)
• Re: pull request on custom elements spec (Tuesday, 6 January)
• Re: ES6 and upgrading custom elements (Tuesday, 6 January)

Dmitry Lomov

• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Thursday, 15 January)

Domenic Denicola

• RE: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• RE: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: Better focus support for Shadow DOM (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RE: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Friday, 16 January)
• RE: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• RE: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)
• RE: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Thursday, 15 January)
• RE: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)
• RE: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)
• RE: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Thursday, 15 January)
• RE: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Wednesday, 14 January)
• RE: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• RE: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• RE: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• RE: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• RE: Adopting a Custom Element into Another Document (Wednesday, 14 January)
• RE: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Wednesday, 14 January)
• RE: Adopting a Custom Element into Another Document (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RE: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RE: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RE: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RE: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RE: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RE: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RE: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RE: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RE: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RE: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Monday, 12 January)
• RE: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Monday, 12 January)
• RE: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Monday, 12 January)
• RE: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Sunday, 11 January)
• Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Saturday, 10 January)
• RE: Custom element lifecycle callbacks (Friday, 9 January)
• RE: ES6 and upgrading custom elements (Wednesday, 7 January)
• RE: ES6 and upgrading custom elements (Wednesday, 7 January)

Dominic Cooney

• Re: [Shadow] Q: Removable shadows (and an idea for lightweight shadows)? (Friday, 27 March)

Edward O'Connor

• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)

Ehsan Akhgari

• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Tuesday, 6 January)

Elliott Sprehn

• Re: [Shadow] Q: Removable shadows (and an idea for lightweight shadows)? (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [Shadow] Q: Removable shadows (and an idea for lightweight shadows)? (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: Standardising canvas-driven background images (Saturday, 21 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Wednesday, 28 January)

Eric Mill

• Re: CORS performance (Wednesday, 18 February)

Erik Arvidsson

• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Monday, 12 January)

Erik Bryn

• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 5 February)

fantasai

• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Saturday, 31 January)

Florian Bösch

• Re: File Save As (Sunday, 29 March)
• Re: File Save As (Sunday, 29 March)
• Re: Proposal for a Permissions API (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: Proposal for a Permissions API (Saturday, 21 March)
• Re: Pointer lock spec (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)

François REMY

• RE: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)

Frederik Braun

• Re: =[xhr] (Friday, 30 January)

Gabor Krizsanits

• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)

George Calvert

• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Monday, 9 February)

Glen

• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Wednesday, 4 February)

Glen Huang

• Re: [IndexedDB] When is an error event dispatched at a transcation? (Friday, 6 February)
• [IndexedDB] When is an error event dispatched at a transcation? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Sunday, 18 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Sunday, 18 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Friday, 16 January)
• oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Friday, 16 January)

Glenn Adams

• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Wednesday, 4 February)

Glenn Maynard

• Re: [clipboard] Feature detect Clipboard API support? (Thursday, 12 February)

Goktug Gokdogan

• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Wednesday, 28 January)

Gregg Tracton

• do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Thursday, 5 February)

Gulfaraz Yasin

• Obsolete Document (Thursday, 26 March)

Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen

• Re: [XHR] UTF-16 - do content sniffing or not? (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: [XHR] UTF-16 - do content sniffing or not? (Monday, 23 March)
• [XHR] UTF-16 - do content sniffing or not? (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: [clipboard API] platform integration stuff - in spec or out of scope? (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: [clipboard API] platform integration stuff - in spec or out of scope? (Saturday, 31 January)
• [clipboard API] platform integration stuff - in spec or out of scope? (Saturday, 31 January)

Harry Halpin

• Re: [WebCrypto.Next] Any ideas on how to proceed? (Thursday, 19 February)

Hayato Ito

• Re: [Shadow] Q: Removable shadows (and an idea for lightweight shadows)? (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: Base Template (Was Re: Minimum viable custom elements) (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: CORS performance (Monday, 23 February)

henry.story@bblfish.net

• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• CORS explained simply (Thursday, 19 February)

Ilya Grigorik

• Re: Security use cases for packaging (Thursday, 29 January)

James Graham

• Re: [websockets] Test results available (Thursday, 26 March)

James M Snell

• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)

James M. Greene

• Re: [clipboard API] platform integration stuff - in spec or out of scope? (Thursday, 12 February)
• [clipboard] Feature detect Clipboard API support? (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: [clipboard API] platform integration stuff - in spec or out of scope? (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 6 February)

Jan Miksovsky

• Re: Base Template (Was Re: Minimum viable custom elements) (Friday, 13 February)

Janina Sajka

• IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 1 April at 21:00Z (Tuesday, 31 March)
• IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 18 March at 21:00Z (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 18 March at 21:00Z (Tuesday, 10 March)
• IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 18 March at 21:00Z (Tuesday, 10 March)
• IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 4 February at 22:00Z for 60 minutes (Tuesday, 3 February)
• IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 21 January at 22:00Z for 60 minutes (Tuesday, 20 January)
• IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 7 January at 22:00Z for 60 minutes (Tuesday, 6 January)

Jeffrey Walton

• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Sunday, 15 February)

Jeffrey Yasskin

• Re: Proposal for a Permissions API (Sunday, 22 March)

Jirka Kosek

• Re: custom elements without the dash (Monday, 5 January)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: File Save As (Sunday, 29 March)
• Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28 (Saturday, 21 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: CORS performance (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: CORS performance proposal (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: CORS performance proposal (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: CORS performance proposal (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance proposal (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: PSA: Indexed Database API is a W3C Recommendation (Friday, 9 January)

Jonathan Bond-Caron

• RE: Minimum viable custom elements (Monday, 9 February)

Joshua Bell

• Re: [IndexedDB] When is an error event dispatched at a transcation? (Thursday, 5 February)

Justin Fagnani

• Re: [Shadow] Q: Removable shadows (and an idea for lightweight shadows)? (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [Shadow] Q: Removable shadows (and an idea for lightweight shadows)? (Thursday, 26 March)
• Range.getClientRanges()? (Thursday, 15 January)

Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu（吕康豪）

• [Screen Orientation] nit for the case when the screen width and height are equal (Thursday, 26 March)

Karl Dubost

• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Monday, 12 January)

Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL

• RE: IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 18 March at 21:00Z (Wednesday, 11 March)
• RE: IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 4 February at 22:00Z for 60 minutes (Tuesday, 3 February)

Kenneth Rohde Christiansen

• Re: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications" (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: [manifest] RE: Manifest for web application; review deadline March 5 (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)

Koji Ishii

• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: [Selection] Support of Multiple Selection (was: Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference?) (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Wednesday, 7 January)

Kurt Cagle

• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Saturday, 7 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Thursday, 5 February)

LOUIFI, Bruno

• =[xhr] (Thursday, 29 January)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Friday, 6 February)

Marc Fawzi

• Re: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Thursday, 12 February)
• Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)

Martin Altenstedt

• [WebSocket API]: Missing request header fields option (Sunday, 25 January)

Martin Thomson

• Re: CORS performance proposal (Saturday, 21 February)
• Re: CORS performance proposal (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CORS performance proposal (Thursday, 19 February)

Mats Palmgren

• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: [Selection] Support of Multiple Selection (was: Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference?) (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Friday, 9 January)

Matthew Robb

• Re: Standardising canvas-driven background images (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Standardising canvas-driven background images (Friday, 20 February)

Melvin Carvalho

• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Saturday, 7 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Thursday, 5 February)

Michael Cooper

• Minuts IndieUI Teleconference 18 March 2015 (Wednesday, 18 March)

Michael[tm] Smith

• Re: [IndexedDB] link to Editor's draft is a 404 (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Spring meeting in Paris? (Monday, 12 January)

Michaela Merz

• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: The futile war between Native and Web (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: [clipboard] Feature detect Clipboard API support? (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: Violation of mail list policy [Was: Fwd: Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest] (Monday, 9 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: Security use cases for packaging (Friday, 30 January)

Michiel De Mey

• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)

Mike West

• Re: CORS performance (Thursday, 19 February)

Mounir Lamouri

• Standardizing autocapitalize (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: [manifest] I18N review in progress (Wednesday, 4 March)

Ms2ger

• Re: [Bug 27709] New: Dictionary MouseEventInit uses keyword attribute for its members (Tuesday, 13 January)

Nick Doty

• Manifest for web application privacy review (Friday, 6 March)

Nilsson, Claes1

• RE: [manifest] RE: Manifest for web application; review deadline March 5 (Friday, 6 March)
• RE: [manifest] RE: Manifest for web application; review deadline March 5 (Friday, 6 March)
• [manifest] RE: Manifest for web application; review deadline March 5 (Thursday, 5 March)

Olivier Forget

• Re: [Selection] Support of Multiple Selection (was: Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference?) (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Friday, 9 January)

Olli Pettay

• Re: [websockets] Test results available (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: <webview> API common subset (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Tuesday, 6 January)

Paul Libbrecht

• Re: [clipboard API] platform integration stuff - in spec or out of scope? (Saturday, 31 January)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Re: Feedback needed for April 2015 face-to-face location by *January 27, 2015* (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Feedback needed for April 2015 face-to-face location by *January 27, 2015* (Tuesday, 20 January)

Phillips, Addison

• RE: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications" (Friday, 20 March)
• [appmanifest] appropriate use of ACI [I18N-ISSUE-417] (Thursday, 19 March)
• [appmanifest] No direction metadata for 'name' (etc.) [I18N-ISSUE-416] (Thursday, 19 March)
• [appmanifest] No language metadata for 'name' [I18N-ISSUE-415] (Thursday, 19 March)
• [appmanifest] No means of obtaining correctly localized manifest [I18N-ISSUE-414] (Thursday, 19 March)
• [appmanifest] No localized examples [I18N-ISSUE-413] (Thursday, 19 March)
• [appmanifest] No localization model [I18N-ISSUE-412] (Thursday, 19 March)
• I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications" (Thursday, 19 March)
• [manifest] I18N review in progress (Thursday, 26 February)

Richard Ishida

• Re: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications" (Tuesday, 24 March)

Robin Berjon

• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Thursday, 12 March)

Ryosuke Niwa

• Re: [Shadow] Q: Removable shadows (and an idea for lightweight shadows)? (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [Shadow] Q: Removable shadows (and an idea for lightweight shadows)? (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: Custom elements: synchronous constructors and cloning (Monday, 23 February)
• Base Template (Was Re: Minimum viable custom elements) (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: [webcomponents]: Let's reach consensus on Shadow DOM (Sunday, 8 February)
• Re: [webcomponents]: Let's reach consensus on Shadow DOM (Sunday, 8 February)
• Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Adopting a Custom Element into Another Document (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: [Selection] Support of Multiple Selection (was: Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference?) (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Adopting a Custom Element into Another Document (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Adopting a Custom Element into Another Document (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Adopting a Custom Element into Another Document (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Tuesday, 6 January)
• Re: Spring meeting in Paris? (Tuesday, 6 January)

Sigbjorn Finne

• Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28 (Tuesday, 24 March)

Simon

• Is clearUndo() in UndoManager the wrong way round? (Saturday, 14 February)

Simon Pieters

• Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28 (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: [XHR] UTF-16 - do content sniffing or not? (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: [XHR] UTF-16 - do content sniffing or not? (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: Defining a constructor for Element and friends (Monday, 19 January)

Spirit

• Re: element.onresize (Tuesday, 13 January)

Steve Faulkner

• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Wednesday, 14 January)
• pull request on custom elements spec (Tuesday, 6 January)
• Re: custom elements without the dash (Monday, 5 January)
• Re: custom elements without the dash (Monday, 5 January)
• Re: custom elements without the dash (Monday, 5 January)
• custom elements without the dash (Monday, 5 January)

SULLIVAN, BRYAN L

• RE: Access to localhost to be outlawed? (Tuesday, 17 March)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: template namespace attribute proposal (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: Standardising canvas-driven background images (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Standardising canvas-driven background images (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: [Selection] Support of Multiple Selection (was: Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference?) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: [Selection] Support of Multiple Selection (was: Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference?) (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive (Friday, 9 January)

Takeshi Yoshino

• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Allow custom headers (Websocket API) (Thursday, 5 February)

Tantek Çelik

• Re: Minimum viable custom elements (Saturday, 31 January)

Ted Dinklocker

• Ted Dinklocker Introduction (Tuesday, 3 February)

Tim Down

• Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference? (Wednesday, 7 January)

Tobie Langel

• Re: [IndexedDB] link to Editor's draft is a 404 (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: [IndexedDB] link to Editor's draft is a 404 (Wednesday, 4 February)
• [IndexedDB] link to Editor's draft is a 404 (Monday, 2 February)

Travis Leithead

• RE: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28 (Thursday, 26 March)
• RE: [Shadow] Q: Removable shadows (and an idea for lightweight shadows)? (Thursday, 26 March)
• RE: [Shadow] Q: Removable shadows (and an idea for lightweight shadows)? (Thursday, 26 March)
• RE: [Shadow] Q: Removable shadows (and an idea for lightweight shadows)? (Thursday, 26 March)
• RE: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Thursday, 26 March)
• [Shadow] Q: Removable shadows (and an idea for lightweight shadows)? (Thursday, 26 March)
• RE: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Friday, 20 March)
• RE: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Wednesday, 18 March)
• RE: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Friday, 13 March)
• [Shadow] URL-based shadows? (Friday, 13 March)
• RE: template namespace attribute proposal (Thursday, 12 March)
• [UIEvents] telecon minutes 10 March 2015 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• RE: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 13 February)
• [DOM3Events/UIEvents] Minutes from 10 Feb 2015 teleconference (Wednesday, 11 February)
• [DOM3Events/UIEvents] Minutes from 27 Jan 2015 teleconference (Wednesday, 28 January)
• [D3E/UIEvents] Transferring related Bugzilla bugs to github issues (Wednesday, 21 January)

Vincent Scheib

• Re: Pointer lock spec (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: Pointer lock spec (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: [Bug 27709] New: Dictionary MouseEventInit uses keyword attribute for its members (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: [Pointer Lock] Comments (Friday, 9 January)

Wayne Carr

• charter template for Community Group used by a large Working Group (Sunday, 29 March)

White, Jason J

• Re: IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 18 March at 21:00Z (Tuesday, 10 March)

William Edney

• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? (Wednesday, 4 February)

Xiaoqian Wu

• Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28 (Wednesday, 25 March)

Yan Zhu

• Re: Security use cases for packaging (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Security use cases for packaging (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Security use cases for packaging (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Security use cases for packaging (Thursday, 29 January)
• Security use cases for packaging (Thursday, 29 January)

Yehuda Katz

• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Custom element design with ES6 classes and Element constructors (Tuesday, 13 January)

个人

• [gamepad]-Demo (Monday, 23 March)

河内 隆仁

• Re: Better focus support for Shadow DOM (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Better focus support for Shadow DOM (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: Better focus support for Shadow DOM (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Better focus support for Shadow DOM (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Better focus support for Shadow DOM (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Better focus support for Shadow DOM (Wednesday, 14 January)

陳侃如

• Re: <webview> API common subset (Monday, 26 January)
• <webview> API common subset (Friday, 23 January)

Халитов Кирилл

• Extending HTMLCanvasElement in Custom Element issue (Wednesday, 11 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2015 23:50:02 UTC