W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:05:18 +0100
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <op.xv49y4s3idj3kv@simons-mbp>
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 13:52:25 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> As previously mentioned on [p-w], the test results for Web Messaging  
> [All] indicate significant interoperability with only two tests that  
> have less than two passes [<2]. The two tests, including a short  
> analysis of the failure, are:
>
> 1. <http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/with-ports/026.html>; this test  
> failure (which passes on Firefox) can be considered more of a Web IDL  
> implementation issue and thus not a significant interop issue.
>
> 2. <http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html>; this  
> test failure (which passes on IE) is considered an implementation bug  
> (MessageChannel and MessagePort are supposed to be exposed to Worker)  
> that is expected to be fixed.
>
> Cindy created a Draft PR [PR] that includes Hixie's updates since the  
> [CR] was published (but not the PortCollection interface [PC] which is  
> not broadly implemented). Overall, we consider the changes since the CR  
> as non-substantive bug fixes and clarifications that align the spec with  
> current implementations, and that the test suite tests the updated spec.  
> See [Diff] for all of changes between the CR and the draft PR and note  
> the draft PR's status section includes a short summary of the changes.
>
> As such, this is a Call for Consensus to publish a Proposed  
> Recommendation of Web Messaging using the [PR] as the basis. Agreement  
> with this CfC means you consider the test results shows interoperability  
> and the changes since CR are not substantive.
>
> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply to  
> this e-mail by March 28 at the latest. Positive response is preferred  
> and encouraged, and silence will be considered as agreement with the  
> proposal. If there are no non-resolvable objections to this proposal,  
> the motion will carry and we will request the PR be published.

Opera supports publishing.

> -Thanks, ArtB
>
> [p-w]  
> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014OctDec/0627.html>
> [All] <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/webmessaging/all.html>
> [<2] <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/webmessaging/less-than-2.html>
> [PR] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/PR-webmessaging-20150407/>
> [CR] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-webmessaging-20120501/>
> [PC] <http://dev.w3.org/html5/postmsg/#broadcasting-to-many-ports>
> [Diff] <https://www.diffchecker.com/qswiibb5>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 07:05:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:27:26 UTC