W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:58:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CADC=+jeABZbHGr-9Gz0TChQ7dcAZwU4MOEwFJV1omg23K4v3Mg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
Cc: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@chromium.org>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, "Edward O'Connor" <eoconnor@apple.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com> wrote:
[snip]


> "a really first-class fallback option if you don't support JS" is
> vital for the quarter of a billion people who use Opera Mini and the
> 100 million people who use the Nokia proxy browser. Fallback rather
> than non-functional pages is vital for the people who don't use latest
> greatest Chromium or Gecko browsers.
>
> b
>

But in the context of custom elements (not shadow dom) these should be able
to do 'createdCallback' etc on the server... I can't really see any reason
why they couldn't/wouldn't.

-- 
Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:58:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:27:25 UTC