- From: Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 17:37:28 +0200
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 03/26/2015 04:51 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Earlier today I ran the Web Sockets tests on Chrome 41, Chrome/Canary 43, FF Nightly 39, IE 11, and Opera 12 and pushed the results to the > test-results repo: > > * All results <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/websockets/all.html> > > * <2 passes <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/websockets/less-than-2.html> > > Overall these results are pretty good: 97% of the 495 tests have two or more passes. > > If anyone is willing to help with the failure analysis, that would be very much appreciated. > > Odin, Simon - for the purposes of evaluating these results and the Candidate Recommendation (exit criteria), should the Opera data be included? > > -Thanks, ArtB > > > websockets/interfaces.html the test itself has bugs (uses old idlharness.js?). Also websockets/interfaces/WebSocket/events/013.html is buggy. Seems to rely on blink/presto's EventHandler behavior, which is not what the specs says should happen. -Olli
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 15:38:00 UTC