W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2015

RE: Minimum viable custom elements

From: Jonathan Bond-Caron <jbondc@gdesolutions.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:05:52 +0000
To: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>
CC: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <SN2PR07MB04824AFCA936936D4D2988FB7270@SN2PR07MB048.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed Feb 4 02:08 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> 
> <x-checkbox><input type="checkbox" checked="true"></x-checkbox>
> <x-slider><input type="range" min="-100" max="100" value="0"
> step="5"></x-slider>
> 

To me this seems like a winning pattern at least when it comes to input.

This did a good job a describing the two approaches:
https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Behavior_Attachment

Where does the decorator pattern/approach stand?
Received on Monday, 9 February 2015 14:06:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:27:25 UTC