- From: Marc Fawzi <marc.fawzi@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:24:08 -0800
- To: Brendan Eich <brendan@secure.meer.net>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Michaela Merz <michaela.merz@hermetos.com>, Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com>, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, Ashley Gullen <ashley@scirra.com>, George Calvert <george.calvert@loudthink.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
What? a good cop bad cop routine? Jonas asks for a constructive contribution or ideas for missing functionality in the web platform and the inventor of JS honors me with a condescending response, as if ... What the hey! Mr. Eich! I guess this explains the origin of JS: a knee jerk reaction to then-trendy ideas... That's not the way to go about all inclusive debate. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 10, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan@secure.meer.net> wrote: > > Please stop overloading public-webapps with idle chatter. > > React and things like it or based on it are going strong. Work there, above the standards. De-jure standardization will follow, and we'll all be better off for that order of work. > > /be > > Marc Fawzi wrote: >> How about a thread-safe but lock-free version of the DOM based on something like Clojure's atom? So we can manipulate the DOM from web workers? With cursor support? >> >> How about immutable data structures for side-effect-free functional programming? >> >> How about .... Will think of more
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2015 02:24:38 UTC