Re: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications"

is it possible to send mail to www-international@w3.org each time 
someone adds somethign to the github issue? (this is the list where we 
track and discuss issues).

if so, i see no real difference between using github or bugzilla – our 
process is designed to cope with both bugzilla and email based comments 
(though it would normally be better to start with the right one rather 
than switch part way, so changing the SOD would indeed help).

we should also ensure, however, that the titles of the issues and any 
associated notification mails always contain the i18n-issue-xxx string 
that will allow us and tracker to locate information for a given thread.


ri



On 20/03/2015 16:40, Christiansen, Kenneth R wrote:
> Marcos, Anssi, what do you think?
>
> I would prefer the comments on GitHub as it seems to be a great place for interacting with the web community, judging from our success so far.
>
> Kenneth
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Phillips, Addison [mailto:addison@lab126.com]
>> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:43 PM
>> To: Christiansen, Kenneth R; public-webapps@w3.org
>> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
>> Subject: RE: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications"
>>
>> Hi Kenneth,
>>
>> Thanks for the reply.
>>
>> I know you're using GitHub. However, whenever I'm filing/forwarding
>> comments on a document on behalf of the Working Group, I always look at
>> the SOTD in the document in question to see what instructions the receiving
>> WG has. In this case, you have a fairly generic SOTD, which says in part:
>>
>> --
>> This document was published by the Web Applications (WebApps) Working
>> Group as a Working Draft. This document is intended to become a W3C
>> Recommendation. If you wish to make comments regarding this document,
>> please send them to public-webapps@w3.org (subscribe, archives). All
>> comments are welcome.
>> --
>>
>> If you prefer to have comments filed to GitHub, perhaps modify your
>> instructions?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Addison
>>
>> Addison Phillips
>> Globalization Architect (Amazon Lab126)
>> Chair (W3C I18N WG)
>>
>> Internationalization is not a feature.
>> It is an architecture.
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Christiansen, Kenneth R
>>> [mailto:kenneth.r.christiansen@intel.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 1:15 AM
>>> To: Phillips, Addison; public-webapps@w3.org
>>> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
>>> Subject: RE: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications"
>>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> The spec authors use GitHub for issue tracking. I duplicated your issues
>> there:
>>> https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues
>>>
>>> Thanks for looking into internationalization issues with the current spec.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Kenneth
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Phillips, Addison [mailto:addison@lab126.com]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 6:20 PM
>>>> To: public-webapps@w3.org
>>>> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
>>>> Subject: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications"
>>>>
>>>> Hello Webapps,
>>>>
>>>> As previously mentioned, I am about to send you comments from the
>>>> Internationalization Working Group on your document (whose current
>>>> iteration lives at [1]). Because we use Tracker for our comments, I
>>>> will be sending each comment under separate cover. The I18N WG is
>>>> always happy to discuss our comments or ways to address same. Please
>>>> let me know if you prefer to receive comments in a different format
>>>> (such as Bugzilla) or if you need additional information.
>>>>
>>>> If you want to see a summary of our comments, you can find them
>>>> tracked at [2]
>>>>
>>>> Regards (for I18N)
>>>>
>>>> Addison
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/appmanifest/ [2]
>>>> http://www.w3.org/International/track/products/74
>>>>
>>>> Addison Phillips
>>>> Globalization Architect (Amazon Lab126) Chair (W3C I18N WG)
>>>>
>>>> Internationalization is not a feature.
>>>> It is an architecture.
>

Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2015 14:21:56 UTC