- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 12:09:11 +0100
- To: Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>
- Cc: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:53 AM, Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> wrote:
> ... all instances of MyInputElement will get all internal slots and other exotic behavior of HTMLInputElement.
That's why I tried to scope this thread to upgrading and not the script side.
The main question is how you tie MyInputElement to something like
<my-input> and have that actually work. It seems Dimitri's answer is
that you don't, you use <input is=my-input> in combination with a
(delayed) prototype mutation and creation callback. And you use
createElement("input", "my-input") or the constructor on the script
side of things.
> Which is that the HTML standard should just define that `HTMLInputElement.extends = "input"`.
We could have that I guess, but it still doesn't help with upgrading, does it?
--
https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2015 11:09:38 UTC