Ugh, I forgot about that. Without subclassing - terseness is a very minor drawback, but remapping the interface is a big pain. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Alice Boxhall <aboxhall@google.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Feb 4, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Chris Bateman <chrisb808@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah, I had noted in that post that wrapping a native element with a >>>> custom element was an option - only drawback is that the markup isn't as >>>> terse (which is generally advertised as one of the selling points of Custom >>>> Elements). But that doesn't seem like a deal breaker to me, if subclassing >>>> needs to be postponed. >>>> >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> >>> As I pointed out ealier: >>> >>> <input is="x-foo"> >>> >>> <x-foo><input></x-foo> >>> >>> seems like barely a ternseness savings worth discussing. >>> >>> >>> Indeed. Also, authors are used to the idea of including a fallback >>> content inside an element after canvas and object elements and this fits >>> well with their mental model. >>> >> >> I'm just trying to get my head around this pattern. In this example, does >> the web page author or the custom element developer embed the input? And >> who is responsible for syncing the relevant attributes across? In reality, >> isn't this going to look more like >> >> <x-checkbox checked="true"> >> <input type="checkbox" checked="true"> >> </x-checkbox> >> >> or as a slightly contrived example, >> >> <x-slider min="-100" max="100" value="0" step="5"> >> <input type="range" min="-100" max="100" value="0" step="5"> >> </x-slider> >> >> Or does the custom element get its state from the embedded element? >> > the custom element uses its contents as input and, in the simplest sense, > just moves it or maps it during creation... In a more complicated world > with something more like shadow dom (a separate topic) it might be > 'projected' > -- > Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 19:12:09 UTC