W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:09:48 -0400
Message-ID: <5511FCCC.40306@gmail.com>
To: Sigbjorn Finne <sof@opera.com>
CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 3/24/15 3:52 PM, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
> Den 3/24/2015 20:37, Arthur Barstow skreiv:
>> On 3/21/15 1:27 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Arthur
>>> Barstow<art.barstow@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>> 2.<http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html>; this
>>>> test
>>>> failure (which passes on IE) is considered an implementation bug
>>>> (MessageChannel and MessagePort are supposed to be exposed to Worker)
>>>> that
>>>> is expected to be fixed.
>>> I'm not sure that we can really consider lack of support in Workers "a
>>> bug". Worker support is generally non-trivial since it requires making
>>> an API work off the main thread.
>>> That said, mozilla has patches for worker support in progress right
>>> now, so hopefully Firefox can serve as second implementation here
>>> soon.
>> Thanks for this info Jonas.
>> My characterization of this failure wasn't especially good. I think the
>> main point with respect to discussing this failure with the Director (or
>> someone acting on his behalf) is that the lack of a second
>> implementation is not caused by a bug/issue in the spec itself, and that
>> at least one other browser vendor already has a relevant patches in
>> progress.
>> Given the large majority of the tests (84/86) have two or more passes
>> and the patch you mention above, it seems reasonable to request moving
>> this spec to PR now. Is that OK with you or should we consider your
>> position a "formal objection"?
> Hi,
> if it helps, Blink now passes those two failing tests; Chrome 
> canary/nightly builds have the fixes included.
> (Fixes for 
> http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/{008,009}.html 
> should appear overnight also.)
> hth

Yes, that is indeed helpful. Thanks Sigbjorn!

Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2015 00:10:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:27:26 UTC