W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: [Selection] Support of Multiple Selection (was: Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference?)

From: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:29:53 -0800
Cc: Ben Peters <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>, Olivier Forget <teleclimber@gmail.com>, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, robin@w3.org, Norbert Lindenberg <w3@lindenbergsoftware.com>
Message-id: <17DDD195-06C6-4FEA-B954-FDDDFF2A74BF@apple.com>
To: Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com>

> On Jan 13, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 07:59 PM, Ben Peters wrote:
>> Multiple selection is an important feature in the future.
> Indeed, there are many important use cases for it.
> Here are some use cases that are implemented using multi-range selections
> in Gecko today:
> * visual selection of bidirectional text
> * selecting table columns
> * selecting multiple fragments of arbitrary content (just hold CTRL)
> * selection with disjoint unselected islands due to CSS user-select:none
> * mapping spell-checking errors
> * highlighting matched words for "Find in Page"
> etc
>> I do not believe “everyone wants to kill it” is accurate. I agree with
>> Olivier that it’s crucial to a full-featured editor. We don’t want to
>> make sites implement this themselves.
> Strongly agreed.  This is complicated to implement correctly and can be
> very slow if you're not careful.  It should be implemented in the UA.
> Since Ranges are well specified, including how they stay valid under
> DOM mutations (DOM spec), I don't see why we should re-invent the wheel
> here.  Especially since there is no alternative proposal on the table.
> BTW, this topic was discussed a while ago on this list:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014AprJun/0620.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014AprJun/0627.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014AprJun/0627.html>

Filed https://github.com/w3c/selection-api/issues/41 <https://github.com/w3c/selection-api/issues/41> to track this.

- R. Niwa

Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:30:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:43 UTC