- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:24:21 -0700
- To: Ashley Gullen <ashley@scirra.com>
- Cc: George Calvert <george.calvert@loudthink.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+fOHfORzi=xQNrdg+GR5wACAOyv0=JQsLKDH2JDEgDeJg@mail.gmail.com>
Given implementations already support synchronous behavior, the only reason to deprecate would be if continuing to support that behavior comes at a significant burden to future versions of these implementations. I would conjecture it is not, so I oppose deprecation on the principle that policy should be determined by the user/author, not the standard. Morality should not be legislated! On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Ashley Gullen <ashley@scirra.com> wrote: > I am on the side that synchronous AJAX should definitely be deprecated, > except in web workers where sync stuff is OK. > > Especially on the modern web, there are two really good alternatives: > - write your code in a web worker where synchronous calls don't hang the > browser > - write async code which doesn't hang the browser > > With modern tools like Promises and the new Fetch API, I can't think of > any reason to write a synchronous AJAX request on the main thread, when an > async one could have been written instead with probably little extra effort. > > Alas, existing codebases rely on it, so it cannot be removed easily. But I > can't see why anyone would argue that it's a good design principle to make > possibly seconds-long synchronous calls on the UI thread. > > > > > On 9 February 2015 at 19:33, George Calvert <george.calvert@loudthink.com> > wrote: > >> I third Michaela and Gregg. >> >> >> >> It is the app and site developers' job to decide whether the user should >> wait on the server — not the standard's and, 99.9% of the time, not the >> browser's either. >> >> >> >> I agree a well-designed site avoids synchronous calls. BUT — there still >> are plenty of real-world cases where the best choice is having the user >> wait: Like when subsequent options depend on the server's reply. Or more >> nuanced, app/content-specific cases where rewinding after an earlier >> transaction fails is detrimental to the overall UX or simply impractical to >> code. >> >> >> >> Let's focus our energies elsewhere — dispensing with browser warnings >> that tell me what I already know and with deprecating features that are >> well-entrenched and, on occasion, incredibly useful. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> George Calvert >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2015 15:25:14 UTC