- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:22:23 +0100
- To: Glen Huang <curvedmark@gmail.com>
- Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Glen Huang <curvedmark@gmail.com> wrote: > Another way to do this is that in mutation method macro, prevent `oldNode` from being added to the doc frag, and after that, insert the doc frag before `oldNode`, finally remove `oldNode`. No recursive finding of next sibling is needed this way. But then d2 would no longer be present? I don't really see a good reason to complicate the algorithm for this scenario, personally. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 16 January 2015 08:22:47 UTC