- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:51:35 +0100
- To: Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> wrote: > Agreed. That needs to be done with <img is="my-img">, IMO. I would really like to avoid having this is="" design. It does not explain anything about the world today. I would rather we gave up on subclassing normal elements (there's no normal element precedent for that anyway). I also agree with Yehuda that we need to explore alternatives to the current upgrading design. It just feels like too much of a hack. Perhaps we should support the synchronous version (invoking the custom element constructor) and come up with something new for asynchronous loaded definitions. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2015 12:51:59 UTC