- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:26:22 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > By your statements implying that composition issues can just be > handled by better discipline and some selector modification, in the > message I responded to earlier. I'm not sure how to interpret those > statement if you didn't mean that composition wasn't worth solving. I think Olli already clarified that he is happy to solve that use case, but that it's unclear that the complexity of shadow DOM is warranted. Note though that e.g. React is out there solving this without need for shadow DOM. Ember is out there and cannot use shadow DOM due to its coupling of style isolation primitives with event retargeting and therefore also has its own solution. (And last I heard seems to take inspiration from React.) Talking to the developers working on these frameworks it's pretty clear we haven't exactly nailed it here and that it's worth exploring what can be done instead. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 13:26:48 UTC