W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:14:53 -0800
Message-ID: <CADh5Ky279fiar38LREiVbP5uC=u2QfaQCuwLhpk6aRR=DVEOaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>
Cc: Erik Arvidsson <arv@google.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24579

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> wrote:

> From: Erik Arvidsson [mailto:arv@google.com]
>
> > I'm not sure how that is speced but in Blink we have an extended IDL
> attribute called CustomElementCallbacks which means that we are going to
> call the pending callbacks after the method/setter.
>
> If I recall this is how Anne and others were saying that it *should* be
> specced, but the spec itself is a bit more vague, leaving it as
>
> > When transitioning back from the user agent code to script, pop the
> element queue from the processing stack and invoke callbacks in that queue.
>
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2015 19:15:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:27:25 UTC