- From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:40:20 +0900
- To: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
- Cc: Olivier Forget <teleclimber@gmail.com>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Pulling out my user hat: Le 11 janv. 2015 à 01:30, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> a écrit : > The reason for all this is that while it makes wonderful theoretical > sense to support multiple ranges for a selection, and is necessary for > extremely sensible features like allowing a user to select columns of > a table, multi-range selections are nonexistent in practice. I'm using multiple range selection very often. From every day to a couple of times a week. My main usage is when I use bookmarking services and I want to keep part of an article which are distant. Basically a "text1 […] text2 […] text3" scenario. I select when reading, and when finish I can bookmark all my selections in once. Also when I want to remove some noise from a paragraph. It's a lot more practical than having to create individual bookmark for each part OR to have to select, bookmark and cut. As a user I find that essential and very practical (implementation details apart). -- Karl Dubost 🐄 http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Monday, 12 January 2015 01:40:31 UTC