Re: Custom elements: synchronous constructors and cloning

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com> wrote:
> Wait, what do you mean by "that is what custom elements provide for today.."
>
> The entire pattern of template-stamping depends on the fact that custom
> elements aren't broken when cloning/importing.

There's no hook for cloning, is there? Or is the created callback
supposed to be invoked? (If it is, that's missing from the
specification.)


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2015 15:37:39 UTC