- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 05:48:15 +0100
- To: Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>
- Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
* Domenic Denicola wrote: >From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] >> I know that this a major concern to you, but my impression is that few >> if any other people regard that as anything more than "nice to have", >> especially if you equate "explaining" with having a public API for it. > >How do you propose having a private constructor API? > >How do you propose instances of the objects even existing at all, if >there is no constructor that creates them? > >This is one of those "only makes sense to a C++ programmer" things. I think it is misleading to describe something as "a design goal" if it is not widely accepted as a design goal, and my impression is that this is not widely accepted as a design goal. I also think it is entirely normal to deal with objects you have no way of creating on your own. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de D-10243 Berlin · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de Available for hire in Berlin (early 2015) · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2015 04:48:56 UTC