word clouds in schema.org
Collections [use case - Property: event]
Actions and Online Presence
emergency/crisis/disaster schemas
JSON-LD in examples invalid due to comments
schema.org docs: minor issues for next update
Re: Support non-commercial usage of schema.org/Offer - RDF(S) patch
feedback on some Action subtypes
webschema-ISSUE-32 (Obsolete action vocab): Schema.org's original vocabulary around actions needs update/integration/deprecation [Feedback on Schema.org]
UserInteraction vs. InteractAction
RE: [a11y-metadata-project] pre-announcement: Schema.org adopts accessibility properties
pre-announcement: Schema.org adopts accessibility properties
Re: MiniSKOS update: back to "Topic" (but thanks for trying out the ConceptCode idea)
- Re: MiniSKOS update: back to "Topic" (but thanks for trying out the ConceptCode idea)
- Re: MiniSKOS update: back to "Topic" (but thanks for trying out the ConceptCode idea)
[public-vocabs] <none>
ESWC 2014 Final Call for Workshops
ESWC 2014 Final Call for Tutorials
Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
MiniSKOS update
webschema-ISSUE-31 (MiniSKOS-LRMI): Schema.org miniSKOS proposal needs careful design for LRMI targetUrl property [SKOS proposals to Schema.org]
webschema-ISSUE-30 (MiniSKOS): Schema.org should define how to use SKOS-like vocabularies [SKOS proposals to Schema.org]
MiniSKOS proposal: add Topic, an equivalentClass to skos:Concept, and relate schema properties to it.
- Re: MiniSKOS proposal: add Topic, an equivalentClass to skos:Concept, and relate schema properties to it.
- Re: MiniSKOS proposal: add Topic, an equivalentClass to skos:Concept, and relate schema properties to it.
- Re: MiniSKOS proposal: add Topic, an equivalentClass to skos:Concept, and relate schema properties to it.
New version of schema.org is in LOV
wishlists using Offer, Demand, Product, seeks, makesOffer, attribution
[proposal] Property: organizer (for Event) || Property: host ?
ESWC 2014 Call for PhD Symposium
ESWC 2014 Second Call for Papers
Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
FW: proposal by Encyclopaedia Britannica
- Re: FW: proposal by Encyclopaedia Britannica
webschema-ISSUE-29 (Descriptions ending with '.''?): Schema.org should decide whether documentation strings end with '.' or not. [Feedback on Schema.org]
Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
webschema-ISSUE-28 (non-type examples): Schema.org should show examples on per-property and per-enumeration pages [Feedback on Schema.org]
webschema-ISSUE-27 (Housekeeping): Schema.org has accumulated some clutter - needs a plan for tidying up archaic vocab and other bugs [Feedback on Schema.org]
webschema-ISSUE-26 (contentLocation): contentLocation is ambiguous
submit
Re: Civic Services Schema. GovernmentService issue
ESWC 2014 Second Call for Tutorials
Suggestion/question for improving datePublished example schema.org
- Re: Suggestion/question for improving datePublished example schema.org
- Re: Suggestion/question for improving datePublished example schema.org
Why are references at schema.org and google developers not consistent?
An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- RE: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- Re: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- Re: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- Re: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- RE: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- Re: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
Purl.org Service Down / GoodRelations Specification
Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process
status of the TV/Radio proposal
webschema-ISSUE-25 (Yuliya Tikhokhod): audience and typicalAgeRange in CreativeWork [Feedback on Schema.org]
determining the source of portions of schema.org
strange identifiers in schema.org
- Re: strange identifiers in schema.org
Minutes from the Novermebr 5, 2013 Accessibility Metadata Working Group call
- Re: Minutes from the Novermebr 5, 2013 Accessibility Metadata Working Group call
- Re: Minutes from the Novermebr 5, 2013 Accessibility Metadata Working Group call
- Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up