- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:03:00 +0100
- To: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>, SchemaDot Org <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 11/26/2013 08:07 PM, Dan Scott wrote: > Ping... is there anything else I can do to help move this forward? +1 Dan, not sure if you noticed my post about work i start on online wishlists and *in-kind* donations: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Nov/0116.html In general I plan to develop number of open source tools helpful for managing economic flows, based on linked data and giving most emphasis on non-commercial ways for sharing resources and services! Relevant CG (sadly not very active) http://www.w3.org/community/community-io/ and more overview minddump: http://polyeconomy.info/ > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net> wrote: >> Hello: >> >> Following the great discussion that began with >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Sep/0088.html I've >> put together a patch that addresses the bulk of the overly-commercial >> definitions in the current iteration of schema.org. >> >> Apologies if the git diff format is inappropriate; I've been mirroring >> schema.org in a local git repo as the core pages do not appear to be >> available in the w3 webschema mercurial repo. >> >> Please let me know if I should generate diffs for the individual type / >> property pages as well, rather than just >> http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html >
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 12:02:41 UTC