Re: Support non-commercial usage of - RDF(S) patch

Ping... is there anything else I can do to help move this forward?

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Dan Scott <> wrote:
> Hello:
> Following the great discussion that began with
> I've
> put together a patch that addresses the bulk of the overly-commercial
> definitions in the current iteration of
> Apologies if the git diff format is inappropriate; I've been mirroring
> in a local git repo as the core pages do not appear to be
> available in the w3 webschema mercurial repo.
> Please let me know if I should generate diffs for the individual type /
> property pages as well, rather than just

Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2013 19:07:49 UTC