- From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:43:09 +0100
- To: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
- Cc: Laura Dawson <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>, "lazarus@lazaruscorporation.co.uk" <lazarus@lazaruscorporation.co.uk>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Dear Lars:
Seeing your affiliation: It would be great if Dun & Bradstreet implemented
- a canonical URI schema for DUNs
and ideally
- return HTML via HTTP for these URIs
and even better
- added at least basic schema.org markup to those pages.
We already have a property for DUNs in schema.org (imported from GoodRelations), see
http://schema.org/duns
This would allow the DUNs and your company to expand the strong position in the field of identifiers for commercial entities into the data marketing age. If you need more input on why this may be worthwhile, contact me by email, please.
Best
Martin
On Nov 21, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Svensson, Lars wrote:
>> The difference to ISBN is that for ISBN codes, there is no canonical URI
>> schema defined (at least to my knowledge).
>
> There is urn:isbn (RFC 3187 [1]) which allows you to mask any ISBN in a URI.
>
> [1] http://www.iana.org/go/rfc3187
>
> /Lars
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
twitter: mfhepp
Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 15:43:42 UTC