- From: Madeleine Rothberg <madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 04:19:27 +0000
- To: Liddy Nevile <liddy@sunriseresearch.org>
- CC: Madeleine Rothberg <madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Charles Myers <charlesm@benetech.org>, "a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com" <a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
I think (and I believe others agree) that this is a new field, computed from accessMode plus accessFeatures. The previous definition of accessMode should remain in place, and the new field you have suggested needs a more specific name. Madeleine On 2013-11-06, at 10:39 PM, "Liddy Nevile" <liddy@sunriseresearch.org> wrote: > correct! > > I have put in what Charles Nevile and I understand to be what is wanted - and what he thinks will work (as far as I can tell) - > > but didn't we discuss this and agree in a meeting last week? I do remember checking it ...because I was not sure ... > > I said something about it being a repeatable property but we had to know that we could stop the sets being concatenated and Charles N said that could be done with a 'blank node' .... and this was in email too... > > Liddy > > On 07/11/2013, at 2:32 PM, Madeleine Rothberg wrote: > >> The group has not agreed to the changes in the definition of access mode >> included here. >> >> -Madeleine >> >> On 11/6/13 10:16 PM, "Liddy Nevile" <liddy@sunriseresearch.org> wrote: >> >>> Dan, >>> >>> your write-up is slightly outdated because we have decided that >>> accessFeature is a better name for the property than >>> mediaFeature...this aligns better with accessMode, we think... and we >>> have also accessHazard and accessControl, I think. >>> >>> We have refinements of these, and for some we have controlled vocab >>> values - but I am assuming that these are not what you need now??? >>> (below I have given the write-up a go...) >>> >>> Liddy >>> >>> On 07/11/2013, at 3:46 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Sounds like you've been very busy! Will someone who is following this >>>> closely be in a position to produce an updated version of the draft >>>> RDFS configuration file we'll need for schema.org? If not, let me know >>>> if you need help (presumably once the revised spec is out). The >>>> current version I've drafted is at >>>> >>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/file/default/schema.org/ext/accessibilit >>>> y.html >>>> >>>> Dan >>> >>> 1 <html> >>> 2 <head> >>> 3 <title>Accessibility vocab</title> >>> 4 </head> >>> 5 <body> >>> 6 >>> 7 <div> >>> 8 <h1>Accessibility Vocabulary</h1> >>> 9 <p>See <a href="http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/ >>> Accessibility">wiki</a> and <a href="http:// >>> a11ymetadata.org/">a11ymetadata.org</a> for details.</p> >>> >>> 10 <div typeof="rdf:Property" resource="http://schema.org/accessHazard"> >>> 11 <span property="rdfs:label">accessHazard</span> >>> 12 <span property="rdfs:comment">A characteristic of the described >>> resource that is physiologically dangerous to some users.</span> >>> 13 <span>Domain: <a href="http://schema.org/CreativeWork" >>> property="schema:domain">CreativeWork</a></span> >>> 14 <span>Range: <a href="http://schema.org/Text" >>> property="schema:range">Text</a></span> >>> 15 </div> >>> >>> 16 <div typeof="rdf:Property" resource="http://schema.org/ >>> accessFeature"> >>> 17 <span property="rdfs:label">accessFeature</span> >>> 18 <span property="rdfs:comment">Access features of the resource >>> commonly used as accessible alternatives, such as signLanguage (used >>> in visual assessMode).</span> >>> 19 <span>Domain: <a href="http://schema.org/CreativeWork" >>> property="schema:domain">CreativeWork</a></span> >>> 20 <span>Range: <a href="http://schema.org/Text" >>> property="schema:range">Text</a></span> >>> 21 </div> >>> >>> 16 <div typeof="rdf:Property" resource="http://schema.org/accessMode"> >>> 17 <span property="rdfs:label">accessMode</span> >>> 18 <span property="rdfs:comment">A set of sensory modalities through >>> which all the intellectual content of a described >>> resource or component is communicated, such as visual + auditory; >>> text; etc. </span> >>> 19 <span>Domain: <a href="http://schema.org/CreativeWork" >>> property="schema:domain">CreativeWork</a></span> >>> 20 <span>Range: <a href="http://schema.org/Text" >>> property="schema:range">Text</a></span> >>> 21 </div> >>> >>> 16 <div typeof="rdf:Property" resource="http://schema.org/ >>> accessControl"> >>> 17 <span property="rdfs:label">accessControl</span> >>> 18 <span property="rdfs:comment">Content features of the resource, >>> such as fully controllable using only keyboard.</span> >>> 19 <span>Domain: <a href="http://schema.org/CreativeWork" >>> property="schema:domain">CreativeWork</a></span> >>> 20 <span>Range: <a href="http://schema.org/Text" >>> property="schema:range">Text</a></span> >>> 21 </div> >>> 22 </div> >>> 23 >>> 24 </body></html> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Accessibility Metadata Project" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to a11y-metadata-project+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> To post to this group, send email to >>> a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 04:20:03 UTC