Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal

On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 02:44:39 +0800, Peter F. Patel-Schneider  
<pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:

> schema.org has enumerated types, which might be better to use than text  
> with a list of expected strings.

Yes, that was what I was thinking... We should make that change.

cheers and thanks

Chaals

> peter
>
> On Nov 18, 2013, at 12:26 AM, Charles McCathie Nevile  
> <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>
>> Oh. The page in question is
>> http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Accessibility and it covers the
>> accessibility proposal for schema.org. I'll annotate it a little further
>> in the next few hours.
>>
>> And the values expected are meant to be enumerated - i.e. the valid  
>> values are the list of values as maintained in the wiki. Is there a  
>> better Datatype for that than "Text"?
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Chaals
>>
>> On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:44:59 +0800, Charles McCathie Nevile
>> <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I updated the Wiki page for the proposal, to separate out the things  
>>> that we hope to adopt in schema.org this week.
>>>
>>> Note that I did a really rushed job (hopefully I'll have time to  
>>> improve on it when I am back from the dentist later), and that I  
>>> haven't yet done the work of annotating more clearly what we expect to  
>>> happen with the rest of the proposal.
>>>
>>> But I figured it was important to communicate at least this much  
>>> instead of getting the whole message right before saying anything.
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> Chaals
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
>>        chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
>>
>


-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 20:37:02 UTC