Friday, 29 November 2013
Thursday, 28 November 2013
- Re: JSON-LD in examples invalid due to comments
- Re: JSON-LD in examples invalid due to comments
- Re: JSON-LD in examples invalid due to comments
- Re: JSON-LD in examples invalid due to comments
- Actions and Online Presence
- Re: JSON-LD in examples invalid due to comments
- Re: JSON-LD in examples invalid due to comments
- emergency/crisis/disaster schemas
- Re: JSON-LD in examples invalid due to comments
- RE: JSON-LD in examples invalid due to comments
- Re: JSON-LD in examples invalid due to comments
- Re: JSON-LD in examples invalid due to comments
- JSON-LD in examples invalid due to comments
- Re: schema.org docs: minor issues for next update
Wednesday, 27 November 2013
- Re: schema.org docs: minor issues for next update
- Re: schema.org docs: minor issues for next update
- Re: schema.org docs: minor issues for next update
- RE: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- Re: Support non-commercial usage of schema.org/Offer - RDF(S) patch
Tuesday, 26 November 2013
- schema.org docs: minor issues for next update
- Re: Support non-commercial usage of schema.org/Offer - RDF(S) patch
- Re: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- Re: UserInteraction vs. InteractAction
- Re: feedback on some Action subtypes
- Re: UserInteraction vs. InteractAction
- Re: UserInteraction vs. InteractAction
Monday, 25 November 2013
- Re: feedback on some Action subtypes
- Re: feedback on some Action subtypes
- Re: feedback on some Action subtypes
- Re: UserInteraction vs. InteractAction
- feedback on some Action subtypes
- Re: UserInteraction vs. InteractAction
- webschema-ISSUE-32 (Obsolete action vocab): Schema.org's original vocabulary around actions needs update/integration/deprecation [Feedback on Schema.org]
- UserInteraction vs. InteractAction
Sunday, 24 November 2013
Saturday, 23 November 2013
Friday, 22 November 2013
- Re: pre-announcement: Schema.org adopts accessibility properties
- pre-announcement: Schema.org adopts accessibility properties
- Re: MiniSKOS update: back to "Topic" (but thanks for trying out the ConceptCode idea)
- Re: MiniSKOS update: back to "Topic" (but thanks for trying out the ConceptCode idea)
- Re: MiniSKOS update
- RE: Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- RE: Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: MiniSKOS update: back to "Topic" (but thanks for trying out the ConceptCode idea)
- Re: MiniSKOS update
- Re: MiniSKOS update: back to "Topic" (but thanks for trying out the ConceptCode idea)
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-31 (MiniSKOS-LRMI): Schema.org miniSKOS proposal needs careful design for LRMI targetUrl property [SKOS proposals to Schema.org]
- Re: MiniSKOS update: back to "Topic" (but thanks for trying out the ConceptCode idea)
- Re: MiniSKOS update
- Re: MiniSKOS update
Thursday, 21 November 2013
- RE: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- [public-vocabs] <none>
- ESWC 2014 Final Call for Workshops
- ESWC 2014 Final Call for Tutorials
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- RE: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: MiniSKOS update
Wednesday, 20 November 2013
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Suggestion/question for improving datePublished example schema.org
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: MiniSKOS update
- Proposal to include ISNI
- Re: MiniSKOS update
- Re: MiniSKOS update
- Re: MiniSKOS update
- Re: MiniSKOS update
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Suggestion/question for improving datePublished example schema.org
- Re: MiniSKOS update
- RE: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- Re: MiniSKOS update
- Re: MiniSKOS update
- Re: MiniSKOS update
- MiniSKOS update
- webschema-ISSUE-31 (MiniSKOS-LRMI): Schema.org miniSKOS proposal needs careful design for LRMI targetUrl property [SKOS proposals to Schema.org]
- webschema-ISSUE-30 (MiniSKOS): Schema.org should define how to use SKOS-like vocabularies [SKOS proposals to Schema.org]
- Re: MiniSKOS proposal: add Topic, an equivalentClass to skos:Concept, and relate schema properties to it.
- Re: MiniSKOS proposal: add Topic, an equivalentClass to skos:Concept, and relate schema properties to it.
- Re: MiniSKOS proposal: add Topic, an equivalentClass to skos:Concept, and relate schema properties to it.
Tuesday, 19 November 2013
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: MiniSKOS proposal: add Topic, an equivalentClass to skos:Concept, and relate schema properties to it.
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: MiniSKOS proposal: add Topic, an equivalentClass to skos:Concept, and relate schema properties to it.
- Re: MiniSKOS proposal: add Topic, an equivalentClass to skos:Concept, and relate schema properties to it.
- Re: New version of schema.org is in LOV
- MiniSKOS proposal: add Topic, an equivalentClass to skos:Concept, and relate schema properties to it.
- Re: New version of schema.org is in LOV
- Re: New version of schema.org is in LOV
- New version of schema.org is in LOV
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- wishlists using Offer, Demand, Product, seeks, makesOffer, attribution
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: proposal by Encyclopaedia Britannica
- Re: [proposal] Property: organizer (for Event) || Property: host ?
- RE: proposal by Encyclopaedia Britannica
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- RE: proposal by Encyclopaedia Britannica
Monday, 18 November 2013
- RE: proposal by Encyclopaedia Britannica
- RE: proposal by Encyclopaedia Britannica
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
Tuesday, 19 November 2013
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
Monday, 18 November 2013
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: proposal by Encyclopaedia Britannica
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- RE: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- RE: [a11y-metadata-project] Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- Re: proposal by Encyclopaedia Britannica
- Re: proposal by Encyclopaedia Britannica
- Re: proposal by Encyclopaedia Britannica
- Re: proposal by Encyclopaedia Britannica
- Re: [proposal] Property: organizer (for Event) || Property: host ?
- Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal
- Re: FW: proposal by Encyclopaedia Britannica
- [proposal] Property: organizer (for Event) || Property: host ?
- ESWC 2014 Call for PhD Symposium
- ESWC 2014 Second Call for Papers
- RE: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- RE: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- RE: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- Updated Wiki to cover proposal
Friday, 15 November 2013
Tuesday, 12 November 2013
Friday, 15 November 2013
Wednesday, 13 November 2013
- Re: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- Re: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- RE: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- RE: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- RE: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- RE: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
Tuesday, 12 November 2013
- webschema-ISSUE-29 (Descriptions ending with '.''?): Schema.org should decide whether documentation strings end with '.' or not. [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- webschema-ISSUE-28 (non-type examples): Schema.org should show examples on per-property and per-enumeration pages [Feedback on Schema.org]
- webschema-ISSUE-27 (Housekeeping): Schema.org has accumulated some clutter - needs a plan for tidying up archaic vocab and other bugs [Feedback on Schema.org]
- webschema-ISSUE-26 (contentLocation): contentLocation is ambiguous
- RE: Civic Services Schema. GovernmentService issue
- submit
Monday, 11 November 2013
- RE: Civic Services Schema. GovernmentService issue
- Re: Civic Services Schema. GovernmentService issue
- ESWC 2014 Second Call for Tutorials
Sunday, 10 November 2013
Friday, 8 November 2013
Saturday, 9 November 2013
- Re: Why are references at schema.org and google developers not consistent?
- Why are references at schema.org and google developers not consistent?
Friday, 8 November 2013
- An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal
- Re: Purl.org Service Down / GoodRelations Specification
- Re: status of the TV/Radio proposal
- Re: status of the TV/Radio proposal
- Purl.org Service Down / GoodRelations Specification
- Re: strange identifiers in schema.org
Thursday, 7 November 2013
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: status of the TV/Radio proposal
- Re: strange identifiers in schema.org
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: strange identifiers in schema.org
- Re: status of the TV/Radio proposal
- Re: strange identifiers in schema.org
- RE: status of the TV/Radio proposal
- Re: strange identifiers in schema.org
- Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process
- Re: status of the TV/Radio proposal
- Re: strange identifiers in schema.org
- Re: status of the TV/Radio proposal
- status of the TV/Radio proposal
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-25 (Yuliya Tikhokhod): audience and typicalAgeRange in CreativeWork [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: strange identifiers in schema.org
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- webschema-ISSUE-25 (Yuliya Tikhokhod): audience and typicalAgeRange in CreativeWork [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: strange identifiers in schema.org
- Re: determining the source of portions of schema.org
- Re: strange identifiers in schema.org
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: strange identifiers in schema.org
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- determining the source of portions of schema.org
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- strange identifiers in schema.org
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
- Re: accessibility RDFS write-up
Wednesday, 6 November 2013
- Re: Minutes from the Novermebr 5, 2013 Accessibility Metadata Working Group call
- Re: Minutes from the Novermebr 5, 2013 Accessibility Metadata Working Group call
- Minutes from the Novermebr 5, 2013 Accessibility Metadata Working Group call
- Re: Recommendation for new vocabulary item