Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal from Dan Brickley on 2013-11-19 (public-vocabs@w3.org from November 2013)

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:48:13 +0000
To: Liddy Nevile <liddy@sunriseresearch.org>
Cc: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, "a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com" <a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=7puwa2fSxCEVN7eL6iaq_3z5xCRw56m_NSeNe=cfjcOw@mail.gmail.com>

On 19 November 2013 00:07, Liddy Nevile <liddy@sunriseresearch.org> wrote:
> I note that everything now has a prefix accessibility eg
> accessibilityFeature. Does this solve the problem with accessHazard ie is accessibilityHazard going to be OK??

There was a problem having a property called 'accessControl'. In a
purely accessibility-oriented setting that might be intuitive. However
schema.org is a general purpose flat namespace, and so the phrase
"access control" is likely to make people think more of passwords,
openid, etc.

Dan

Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2013 14:48:47 UTC