Re: Accessibility for schema.org Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal

schema.org has enumerated types, which might be better to use than text with a list of expected strings.

peter

On Nov 18, 2013, at 12:26 AM, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:

> Oh. The page in question is
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Accessibility and it covers the
> accessibility proposal for schema.org. I'll annotate it a little further
> in the next few hours.
> 
> And the values expected are meant to be enumerated - i.e. the valid values are the list of values as maintained in the wiki. Is there a better Datatype for that than "Text"?
> 
> cheers
> 
> Chaals
> 
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:44:59 +0800, Charles McCathie Nevile
> <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I updated the Wiki page for the proposal, to separate out the things that we hope to adopt in schema.org this week.
>> 
>> Note that I did a really rushed job (hopefully I'll have time to improve on it when I am back from the dentist later), and that I haven't yet done the work of annotating more clearly what we expect to happen with the rest of the proposal.
>> 
>> But I figured it was important to communicate at least this much instead of getting the whole message right before saying anything.
>> 
>> cheers
>> 
>> Chaals
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
>        chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
> 

Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 18:45:06 UTC