- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:44:39 -0800
- To: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Cc: "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, "a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com" <a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>
schema.org has enumerated types, which might be better to use than text with a list of expected strings. peter On Nov 18, 2013, at 12:26 AM, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > Oh. The page in question is > http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Accessibility and it covers the > accessibility proposal for schema.org. I'll annotate it a little further > in the next few hours. > > And the values expected are meant to be enumerated - i.e. the valid values are the list of values as maintained in the wiki. Is there a better Datatype for that than "Text"? > > cheers > > Chaals > > On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:44:59 +0800, Charles McCathie Nevile > <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I updated the Wiki page for the proposal, to separate out the things that we hope to adopt in schema.org this week. >> >> Note that I did a really rushed job (hopefully I'll have time to improve on it when I am back from the dentist later), and that I haven't yet done the work of annotating more clearly what we expect to happen with the rest of the proposal. >> >> But I figured it was important to communicate at least this much instead of getting the whole message right before saying anything. >> >> cheers >> >> Chaals >> > > > -- > Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex > chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com >
Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 18:45:06 UTC